A strategic decision support system framework for energy-efficient technology investments

被引:8
作者
Cano, Emilio L. [1 ]
Moguerza, Javier M. [1 ]
Ermolieva, Tatiana [2 ]
Yermoliev, Yurii [2 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Madrid, Spain
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Decision support systems; Dynamic stochastic programming; Uncertainty modelling; Strategic and operational planning; OPTIMIZATION MODEL; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION; SML LANGUAGE; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s11750-016-0429-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Energy systems optimization under uncertainty is increasing in its importance due to on-going global de-regulation of the energy sector and the setting of environmental and efficiency targets which generate new multi-agent risks requiring a model-based stakeholders dialogue and new systemic regulations. This paper develops an integrated framework for decision support systems (DSS) for the optimal planning and operation of a building infrastructure under appearing systemic de-regulations and risks. The DSS relies on a new two-stage, dynamic stochastic optimization model with moving random time horizons bounded by stopping time moments. This allows to model impacts of potential extreme events and structural changes emerging from a stakeholders dialogue, which may occur at any moment of the decision making process. The stopping time moments induce endogenous risk aversion in strategic decisions in a form of dynamic VaR-type systemic risk measures dependent on the system's structure. The DSS implementation via an algebraic modeling language (AML) provides an environment that enforces the necessary stakeholders dialogue for robust planning and operation of a building infrastructure. Such a framework allows the representation and solution of building infrastructure systems optimization problems, to be implemented at the building level to confront rising systemic economic and environmental global changes.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 270
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511598951.003
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NY TIMES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DECISION MAKING UNCE
[4]   ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION, UNCERTAINTY, AND IRREVERSIBILITY [J].
ARROW, KJ ;
FISHER, AC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1974, 88 (02) :312-319
[5]  
Birge JR, 2011, SPRINGER SER OPER RE, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0237-4
[7]   Development of an optimization model for energy systems planning in the Region of Waterloo [J].
Cai, Y. P. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Yang, Z. F. ;
Lin, Q. G. ;
Bass, B. ;
Tan, Q. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (11) :988-1005
[8]  
Cano E. L., 2012, Six sigma with R: statistical engineering for process improvement, V36
[9]  
Cano EL, 2015, DATA BRIEF UNPUB
[10]   A multi-stage stochastic optimization model for energy systems planning and risk management [J].
Cano, Emilio L. ;
Moguerza, Javier M. ;
Alonso-Ayuso, Antonio .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 110 :49-56