Beta-binomial model for meta-analysis of odds ratios

被引:20
作者
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas [1 ]
Kulinskaya, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Sch Comp Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Intra-cluster correlation; odds ratio; fixed-effect model; random-effects model; beta-binomial distribution; overdispersion; heterogeneity; COCHRANS Q TEST; CLINICAL-TRIALS; VARIANCE; HETEROGENEITY; MISUNDERSTANDINGS; OVERDISPERSION; ESTIMATORS; DIFFERENCE; FRAMEWORK; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7233
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs), heterogeneity between the studies is usually modelled via the additive random effects model (REM). An alternative, multiplicative REM for ORs uses overdispersion. The multiplicative factor in this overdispersion model (ODM) can be interpreted as an intra-class correlation (ICC) parameter. This model naturally arises when the probabilities of an event in one or both arms of a comparative study are themselves beta-distributed, resulting in beta-binomial distributions. We propose two new estimators of the ICC for meta-analysis in this setting. One is based on the inverted Breslow-Day test, and the other on the improved gamma approximation by Kulinskaya and Dollinger (2015, p. 26) to the distribution of Cochran's Q. The performance of these and several other estimators of ICC on bias and coverage is studied by simulation. Additionally, the Mantel-Haenszel approach to estimation of ORs is extended to the beta-binomial model, and we study performance of various ICC estimators when used in the Mantel-Haenszel or the inverse-variance method to combine ORs in meta-analysis. The results of the simulations show that the improved gamma-based estimator of ICC is superior for small sample sizes, and the Breslow-Day-based estimator is the best for n >= 100. The Mantel-Haenszel-based estimator of OR is very biased and is not recommended. The inverse-variance approach is also somewhat biased for ORs not equal 1, but this bias is not very large in practical settings. Developed methods and R programs, provided in the Web Appendix, make the beta-binomial model a feasible alternative to the standard REM for meta-analysis of ORs. (C) 2017 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1715 / 1734
页数:20
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Alanko T, 1996, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V45, P269
[2]  
ASHBY D, 1993, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V42, P385
[3]   Inference for binomial probability based on dependent Bernoulli random variables with applications to meta-analysis and group level studies [J].
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas ;
Kulinskaya, Elena ;
Morgenthaler, Stephan .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 58 (04) :896-914
[4]   The two-dimensional beta binomial distribution [J].
Bibby, Bo Martin ;
Vaeth, Michael .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2011, 81 (07) :884-891
[5]  
Biggerstaff BJ, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P753, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<753::AID-SIM494>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-7
[7]   Estimating risk difference in multicenter studies under baseline-risk heterogeneity [J].
Böhning, D ;
Sarol, J .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (01) :304-308
[8]  
Bolker BM, 2011, EMDBOOK ECOLOGICAL M, V1
[9]  
Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[10]   Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events [J].
Bradburn, Michael J. ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Localio, A. Russell .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) :53-77