Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis

被引:22
作者
Treloar, Susan A.
Morley, Katherine I.
Taylor, Sandra D.
Hall, Wayne D.
机构
[1] Queensland Inst Med Res, Genet Epidemiol Lab, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Off Publ Policy & Eth, Inst Mol Biosci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Social Work & Appl Human Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
complex etiology; endometriosis; genetic epidemiology; public understanding; qualitative research; study participants;
D O I
10.1159/000099083
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: This exploratory, pilot study aimed to investigate motivations and reflections of participants who had provided epidemiological information, blood samples and access to clinical records and data in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis, a common multifactorial disorder affecting women. We also aimed to explore understanding of complex genetic or multifactorial conditions in general. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 endometriosis study participants with diverse characteristics. Results: Interviewees generally described their participation in the genetic study using altruistic frameworks of reference. Themes that emerged included unquestioning willingness and consent to participate, little concern about privacy issues, desire for more information from the researchers about the condition rather than scientific progress, the benefits of research participation to family communication, and differing ideas about genetic influences on endometriosis. Specific features of endometriosis also influenced reflections on research participation experience. Conclusions: As increasing numbers of individuals and families in the community become involved in genetic epidemiological studies of common diseases, more extensive research will be needed to better understand their expectations with a view to improving researchers' communications with study participants. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 71
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Psychological consequences and predictors of adverse events in the first 5 years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease [J].
Almqvist, EW ;
Brinkman, RR ;
Wiggins, S ;
Hayden, MR .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2003, 64 (04) :300-309
[2]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS C
[3]   Impact of endometriosis on women's health: comparative historical data show that the earlier the onset, the more severe the disease [J].
Ballweg, ML .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) :201-218
[4]   Blaming the victim - The psychologizing of endometriosis [J].
Ballweg, ML .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 24 (02) :441-+
[5]   Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study [J].
Bates, BR .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (01) :47-65
[6]   Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic [J].
Collins, V ;
Halliday, J ;
Warren, R ;
Williamson, R .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2000, 58 (06) :460-468
[7]   What is 'public opinion' about genetics? [J].
Condit, C .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2001, 2 (10) :811-815
[8]   Endometriosis, retrograde menstruation and peritoneal inflammation in women and in baboons [J].
D'Hooghe, TM ;
Debrock, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2002, 8 (01) :84-88
[9]   Pain in endometriosis: effectiveness of medical and surgical management [J].
Davis, CJ ;
McMillan, L .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (06) :507-512
[10]   Immunology of endometriosis [J].
Dmowski, WP ;
Braun, DR .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) :245-263