An integrated performance evaluation approach for the Indian smart cities

被引:6
作者
Chakraborty, Santonab [1 ]
Ghosh, Sayantan [2 ]
Agarwal, Subham [2 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [2 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Univ Technol, Ind Engn & Management Dept, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
关键词
Indian smart city; Performance; Evaluation; DEMATEL; MABAC; TRANSPORT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12597-021-00527-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A smart city can be defined as an urban region with modern technological features, enhanced mobility and upgraded public utility services. Query In this paper, the application of an integrated approach is proposed to assess the relative performance of 98 Indian smart cities with respect to 11 evaluation criteria. Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method is first adopted to divide all the considered criteria into appropriate cause and effect groups along with the determination of their weights. It also identifies the most influential criterion which dominates the others, and the most trivial criterion which is being dominated by the others. The application of the generalized k-means clustering algorithm reduces the initial dataset containing 98 smart cities into a manageable set with only 23 efficient cities. Finally, multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method is adopted to rank the shortlisted cities from the best to the worst. In the derived ranking list, Aizawl occupies the top position, followed by Mangalore. Warangal and Bilaspur are the two worst performing cities. The proposed approach can also recognize the relative strengths and weaknesses of each of the cities so that appropriate remedial measures can be augmented to strengthen the lagging infrastructures of the underperforming Indian smart cities.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 941
页数:36
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Strategic Project Portfolio Selection of Agro By-Products
    Debnath, Animesh
    Roy, Jagannath
    Kar, Samarjit
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [12] A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities
    Debnath, Ashim Kumar
    Chin, Hoong Chor
    Haque, Md. Mazharul
    Yuen, Belinda
    [J]. CITIES, 2014, 37 : 47 - 56
  • [13] The Smart City Concept in the 21st Century
    Eremia, Mircea
    Toma, Lucian
    Sanduleac, Mihai
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING, INTER-ENG 2016, 2017, 181 : 12 - 19
  • [14] A clinical decision-making mechanism for context-aware and patient-specific remote monitoring systems using the correlations of multiple vital signs
    Forkan, Abdur Rahim Mohammad
    Khalil, Ibrahim
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2017, 139 : 1 - 16
  • [15] Gabus A., 1973, DEMATEL Report No. 1
  • [16] Gabus A., 1976, The DEMATEL observer
  • [17] Smartainability: a methodology for assessing the sustainability of the smart city
    Girardi, Pierpaolo
    Temporelli, Andrea
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, SEB-16, 2017, 111 : 820 - 826
  • [18] Jawaid MF., 2015, INT J ADV RES SCI EN, V4, P991
  • [19] Kourtit, 2013, TINBERGEN I DISCUSSI, V108, P1
  • [20] Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations
    Marttunen, Mika
    Lienert, Judit
    Belton, Valerie
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 263 (01) : 1 - 17