An integrated performance evaluation approach for the Indian smart cities

被引:6
作者
Chakraborty, Santonab [1 ]
Ghosh, Sayantan [2 ]
Agarwal, Subham [2 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [2 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Univ Technol, Ind Engn & Management Dept, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
关键词
Indian smart city; Performance; Evaluation; DEMATEL; MABAC; TRANSPORT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12597-021-00527-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A smart city can be defined as an urban region with modern technological features, enhanced mobility and upgraded public utility services. Query In this paper, the application of an integrated approach is proposed to assess the relative performance of 98 Indian smart cities with respect to 11 evaluation criteria. Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method is first adopted to divide all the considered criteria into appropriate cause and effect groups along with the determination of their weights. It also identifies the most influential criterion which dominates the others, and the most trivial criterion which is being dominated by the others. The application of the generalized k-means clustering algorithm reduces the initial dataset containing 98 smart cities into a manageable set with only 23 efficient cities. Finally, multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method is adopted to rank the shortlisted cities from the best to the worst. In the derived ranking list, Aizawl occupies the top position, followed by Mangalore. Warangal and Bilaspur are the two worst performing cities. The proposed approach can also recognize the relative strengths and weaknesses of each of the cities so that appropriate remedial measures can be augmented to strengthen the lagging infrastructures of the underperforming Indian smart cities.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 941
页数:36
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Akbar PA, 2018, 25218 NBER
  • [2] Al-Nasrawi Sukaina, 2015, JISTEM J.Inf.Syst. Technol. Manag., V12, P541
  • [3] Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives
    Albino, Vito
    Berardi, Umberto
    Dangelico, Rosa Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [4] Evaluation of Sustainability Indicators in Smart Cities for India Using MCDM Approach
    Anand, Atul
    Rufuss, D. Dsilva Winfred
    Rajkumar, V.
    Suganthi, L.
    [J]. POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, (CPESE 2017), 2017, 141 : 211 - 215
  • [5] BISWAS T, 2018, MANAGEMENT SCI LETT, V8, P121, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2017.11.004
  • [6] Towards evaluation design for smart city development
    Caird, Sally P.
    Hallett, Stephen H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, 2019, 24 (02) : 188 - 209
  • [7] Non-traditional machining processes selection and evaluation: A rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison approach
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Dandge, Shruti Sudhakar
    Agarwal, Subham
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 139
  • [8] A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects
    Chatterjee, Kajal
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
    Adhikary, Krishnendu
    Kar, Samarjit
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [9] Chatterjee P, 2017, FACTA UNIV-SER MECH, V15, P439, DOI 10.22190/FUME170508024C
  • [10] Deakin M, 2011, INTELL BUILD INT, V3, P140, DOI 10.1080/17508975.2011.586671