Consumer preferences for a green certificate program in South Korea

被引:24
作者
Bae, Jeong Hwan [1 ]
Rishi, Meenakshi [2 ]
Li, Dmitriy [3 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Business Adm Coll, Dept Econ, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Seattle Univ, Albers Sch Business & Econ, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Business Adm Coll, Dempartment Econ, Gwangju, South Korea
关键词
Green certificate program; Renewable electricity; Choice experiment; Willingness to pay (WTP); Unobservable heterogeneity; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ELECTRICITY; SUPPORT; PARTICIPATION; ATTRIBUTES; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.120726
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study explores whether residential consumers in South Korea are willing to participate in a hypothetical green certificate program. We employ a choice experiment to examine the heterogeneous preferences of South Korean consumers via three different estimation modelsd a mixed logit, a latent class, and a hybrid model that combines both the mixed logit and the latent class models. The mixed logit estimations suggest that solar power is preferred to wind or bio energy but with the greatest heterogeneity. Approximately 67% of respondents indicate a significant preference for a green certificate program in the latent class model specification. Estimates from the hybrid model reveal that respondents who are in favor of a green certificate also prefer solar power and a higher share of renewable electricity, but with significant heterogeneity. Willingness to Pay (WTP) calculations for the hypothetical green certificate range between 9.6USD/month and 10.6USD/month. Our results suggest that a tradeable green certificate program that is open to residential consumers and one that operates distinctly from the prevailing renewable energy certificate (REC) market in South Korea, has the potential of enabling the country attain its renewable energy goals while ensuring global competitiveness and the cost-efficient development of green energy. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]   Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Swait, J ;
Boxall, P ;
Louviere, J ;
Williams, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :65-84
[3]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[4]   Green Certificates and Market Power on the Nordic Power Market [J].
Amundsen, Eirik S. ;
Bergman, Lars .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (02) :101-117
[5]  
Andor M., 2017, RUHR EC PAPERS, V671
[6]  
Andor MA, 2018, RUHR EC PAPERS, V759, DOI [10.4419/86788884, DOI 10.4419/86788884]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Renewables 2020 - Analysis and Forecast to 2025
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, EN ISS OPT TECHN SCI
[9]   Increasing consumer participation rates for green pricing programs: A choice experiment for South Korea [J].
Bae, Jeong Hwan ;
Rishi, Meenakshi .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 :490-502
[10]   Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments [J].
Bergmann, A ;
Hanley, M ;
Wright, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (09) :1004-1014