AN EVALUATION OF EMERGING PREFERENCE FOR NON-PREFERRED FOODS TARGETED IN THE TREATMENT OF FOOD SELECTIVITY

被引:9
作者
Penrod, Becky [1 ]
VanDalen, Kate H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Psychol, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
关键词
STIMULUS PREFERENCE; DISABILITIES; REINFORCERS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1002/bin.306
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Several studies have shown that the acquisition of food consumption does not occur until after escape prevention is implemented. However, the mechanism responsible for the maintenance of food consumption may be due to participants contacting the reinforcing properties of food targeted during intervention such that the food naturally reinforces food consumption. The present study extended the literature on feeding disorders by conducting pre- and post-treatment preference assessments to determine if preference for non-preferred foods (NPFs) had developed after exposure to a treatment comparison of sequential and simultaneous food presentation; presentation methods were implemented alone and combined with escape prevention in the form of a non-removal of the spoon (NRS) procedure. Results for three participants with food selectivity indicated that preference for NPFs developed after being exposed to those foods during either treatment sessions or generalization probes. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 251
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Budd K.S., 1998, Childhood feeding disorders: Biobehavioral assessment and intervention, P93
[2]   Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (04) :519-533
[3]   A COMPARISON OF 2 APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES [J].
FISHER, W ;
PIAZZA, CC ;
BOWMAN, LG ;
HAGOPIAN, LP ;
OWENS, JC ;
SLEVIN, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1992, 25 (02) :491-498
[4]   A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcements treatments for food selectivity [J].
Kern, L ;
Marder, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (02) :243-246
[5]   Food selectivity and problem behavior in children with developmental disabilities - Analysis and intervention [J].
Levin, L ;
Carr, EG .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2001, 25 (03) :443-470
[6]   Effect of brief clinic-based training on the ability of caregivers to implement escape extinction [J].
McCartney, EJ ;
Anderson, CM ;
English, CL .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 7 (01) :18-32
[7]   Increasing variety of foods consumed by blending nonpreferred foods into preferred foods [J].
Mueller, MM ;
Piazza, CC ;
Patel, MR ;
Kelley, ME ;
Pruett, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2004, 37 (02) :159-170
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS [J].
PACE, GM ;
IVANCIC, MT ;
EDWARDS, GL ;
IWATA, BA ;
PAGE, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1985, 18 (03) :249-255
[9]   Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response pattterns [J].
Penrod, Becky ;
Wallace, Michele D. ;
Dyer, Edwin J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2008, 41 (02) :177-188
[10]   An evaluation of simultaneous and sequential presentation of preferred and nonpreferred food to treat food selectivity [J].
Piazza, CC ;
Patel, MR ;
Santana, CM ;
Goh, HL ;
Delia, MD ;
Lancaster, BM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2002, 35 (03) :259-270