Radiation exposure during CT-guided biopsies: recent CT machines provide markedly lower doses

被引:25
作者
Guberina, Nika [1 ]
Forsting, Michael [1 ]
Ringelstein, Adrian [1 ]
Suntharalingam, Saravanabavaan [1 ]
Nassenstein, Kai [1 ]
Theysohn, Jens [1 ]
Wetter, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Neuroradiol, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
Radiation exposure; Image-guided biopsy; Multidetector computed tomography; Radiation monitoring; Ionizing radiation; PARAMETERS; SCANS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5350-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To examine radiation dose levels of CT-guided interventional procedures of chest, abdomen, spine and extremities on different CT-scanner generations at a large multicentre institute. 1,219 CT-guided interventional biopsies of different organ regions ((A) abdomen (n=516), (B) chest (n=528), (C) spine (n=134) and (D) extremities (n=41)) on different CT-scanners ((I) SOMATOM-Definition-AS+, (II) Volume-Zoom, (III) Emotion6) were included from 2013-2016. Important CT-parameters and standard dose-descriptors were retrospectively examined. Additionally, effective dose and organ doses were calculated using Monte-Carlo simulation, following ICRP103. Overall, radiation doses for CT interventions are highly dependent on CT-scanner generation: the newer the CT scanner, the lower the radiation dose imparted to patients. Mean effective doses for each of four procedures on available scanners are: (A) (I) 9.3mSv versus (II) 13.9mSv (B) (I) 7.3mSv versus (III) 11.4mSv (C) (I) 6.3mSv versus (II) 7.4mSv (D) (I) 4.3mSv versus (II) 10.8mSv. Standard dose descriptors [standard deviation (SD); CT dose index(vol) (CTDIvol); dose-length product (DLPbody); size-specific dose estimate (SSDE)] were also compared. Effective dose, organ doses and SSDE for various CT-guided interventional biopsies on different CT-scanner generations following recommendations of the ICRP103 are provided. New CT-scanner generations involve markedly lower radiation doses versus older devices. aEuro cent Effective dose, organ dose and SSDE are provided for CT-guided interventional examinations. aEuro cent These data allow identifying organs at risk of higher radiation dose. aEuro cent Detailed knowledge of radiation dose may contribute to a better individual risk-stratification. aEuro cent New CT-scanner generations involve markedly lower radiation doses compared to older devices.
引用
收藏
页码:3929 / 3935
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios
    Leijenaar, Ralph T. H.
    Parmar, Chintan
    Grossmann, Patrick
    Cavalho, Sara
    Bussink, Johan
    Monshouwer, Rene
    Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
    Rietveld, Derek
    Hoebers, Frank
    Rietbergen, Michelle M.
    Leemans, C. Rene
    Dekker, Andre
    Quackenbush, John
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Lambin, Philippe
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 5
  • [2] Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure
    Brenner, David J.
    Hall, Eric J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) : 2277 - 2284
  • [3] Size-specific Dose Estimation for CT: How Should It Be Used and What Does It Mean?
    Brink, James A.
    Morin, Richard L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) : 666 - 668
  • [4] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Identifying Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers by Leveraging Public Gene Expression Microarray Data-Methods and Preliminary Results
    Gevaert, Olivier
    Xu, Jiajing
    Hoang, Chuong D.
    Leung, Ann N.
    Xu, Yue
    Quon, Andrew
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    Napel, Sandy
    Plevritis, Sylvia K.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 264 (02) : 387 - 396
  • [5] Efficacy of high-pitch CT protocols for radiation dose reduction
    Guberina, N.
    Lechel, U.
    Forsting, M.
    Ringelstein, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2016, 36 (04) : N57 - N66
  • [6] Guberina N, 2017, ACTA RADIOL, DOI [10.1177//0284185117716199, DOI 10.1177//0284185117716199]
  • [7] Radiation Dose Monitoring in the Clinical Routine
    Guberina, Nika
    Forsting, Michael
    Suntharalingam, Saravanabavaan
    Nassenstein, Kai
    Theysohn, Jens
    Ringelstein, Adrian
    Wetter, Axel
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2017, 189 (04): : 356 - 360
  • [8] Clinical evaluation of a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in assessment of eye lens doses for cranial CT scans
    Guberina, Nika
    Suntharalingam, Saravanabavaan
    Nassenstein, Kai
    Forsting, Michael
    Theysohn, Jens
    Wetter, Axel
    Ringelstein, Adrian
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 58 (10) : 955 - 959
  • [9] ICRP, 2007, ANN ICRP, V37, P3, DOI [10.1016/j.icrp.2008.08.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ICRP.2008.08.001]
  • [10] US Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations
    Kanal, Kalpana M.
    Butler, Priscilla F.
    Sengupta, Debapriya
    Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi
    Coombs, Laura P.
    Morin, Richard L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 284 (01) : 120 - 133