Sociotechnical imaginaries of algorithmic governance in EU policy on online disinformation and FinTech

被引:11
作者
Wijermars, Marielle [1 ]
Makhortykh, Mykola [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Cyber Secur & Polit, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Commun & Media Studies, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Algorithmic governance; digital policy; disinformation; European Union; FinTech; sociotechnical imaginaries; BIG DATA; TRANSPARENCY; IMPACT; NEED;
D O I
10.1177/14614448221079033
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Datafication and the use of algorithmic systems increasingly blur distinctions between policy fields. In the financial sector, for example, algorithms are used in credit scoring, money has become transactional data sought after by large data-driven companies, while financial technologies (FinTech) are emerging as a locus of information warfare. To grasp the context specificity of algorithmic governance and the assumptions on which its evaluation within different domains is based, we comparatively study the sociotechnical imaginaries of algorithmic governance in European Union (EU) policy on online disinformation and FinTech. We find that sociotechnical imaginaries prevalent in EU policy documents on disinformation and FinTech are highly divergent. While the first can be characterized as an algorithm-facilitated attempt to return to the presupposed status quo (absence of manipulation) without a defined future imaginary, the latter places technological innovation at the centre of realizing a globally competitive Digital Single Market.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 963
页数:22
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]  
Muller-Birn Claudia, 2013, P 6 INT C COMM TECHN, P80, DOI 10.1145/2482991.2482999event-place
[42]   Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeepers [J].
Napoli, Philip M. .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2015, 39 (09) :751-760
[43]  
Noble Safiya Umoja, 2018, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, DOI [DOI 10.18574/NYU/9781479833641.001.0001, DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1PWT9W5]
[44]  
Olhede Sofia., 2017, Significance, V14, P8, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1740-9713.2017.01012.X, 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2017.01012.x]
[45]  
Pasquale F., 2015, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
[46]   The Crisisification of Policy-making in the European Union [J].
Rhinard, Mark .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2019, 57 (03) :616-633
[47]  
Riis T, 2019, J INTERNET LAW, P1
[48]  
Ruppert Evelyn, 2019, Statistical Journal of the IAOS, V35, P633, DOI 10.3233/SJI-190538
[49]   A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence: Examining the political harms of algorithmic governance in the domain of government [J].
Saetra, Henrik Skaug .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 62
[50]   Combating Disinformation on Social Media: Multilevel Governance and Distributed Accountability in Europe [J].
Saurwein, Florian ;
Spencer-Smith, Charlotte .
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2020, 8 (06) :820-841