Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population

被引:54
作者
Kuehle, Christiane A.
Langhorst, Jost
Ladd, Susanne C.
Zoepf, Thomas
Nuefer, Michael
Grabellus, Florian
Barkhausen, Joerg
Gerken, Guido
Lauenstein, Thomas C.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Neuroradiol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Essen, Germany
[3] Hosp Essen, Dept Pathol, Essen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.2006.109306
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) without bowel cleansing in a screening population and compare the results to colonoscopy as a standard of reference. Methods: 315 screening patients, older than 50 years with a normal risk profile for colorectal cancer, were included in this study. For MRC, a tagging agent (5.0% Gastrografin, 1.0% barium sulphate, 0.2% locust bean gum) was ingested with each main meal within 2 days prior to MRC. No bowel cleansing was applied. For the magnetic resonance examination, a rectal water enema was administered. Data collection was based on contrast enhanced T1 weighted images and TrueFISP images. Magnetic resonance data were analysed for image quality and the presence of colorectal lesions. Conventional colonoscopy and histopathological samples served as reference. Results: In 4% of all colonic segments, magnetic resonance image quality was insufficient because of untagged faecal material. Adenomatous polyps > 5 mm were detected by means of MRC, with a sensitivity of 83.0%. Overall specificity was 90.2% (false positive findings in 19 patients). However, only 16 of 153 lesions < 5 mm and 9 of 127 hyperplastic polyps could be visualised on magnetic resonance images. Conclusions: Faecal tagging MRC is applicable for screening purposes. It provides good accuracy for the detection of relevant (ie, adenomatous) colorectal lesions > 5 mm in a screening population. However, refinements to optimise image quality of faecal tagging are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1085
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Lauenstein, TC ;
Pelster, G ;
Holtmann, G ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Debatin, JF ;
Goehde, SC .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :452-459
[2]   Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Pelster, G ;
Treichel, U ;
Vogt, FM ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Lauenstein, TC .
GUT, 2003, 52 (12) :1738-1743
[3]   Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy [J].
Akerkar, GA ;
Yee, J ;
Hung, R ;
McQuaid, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (03) :310-315
[4]  
Bond J H, 2000, Semin Gastrointest Dis, V11, P176
[5]   Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp [J].
Bond, JH .
ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (05) :454-457
[6]   Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :735-738
[7]   Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only [J].
Bruzzi, JF ;
Moss, AC ;
Brennan, DD ;
MacMathuna, P ;
Fenlon, HM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (05) :763-767
[8]   Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Benoit, PC ;
Palesch, YY ;
Mauldin, PD ;
Hoffman, B ;
Vining, DJ ;
Small, WC ;
Affronti, J ;
Rex, D ;
Kopecky, KK ;
Ackerman, S ;
Burdick, JS ;
Brewington, C ;
Turner, MA ;
Zfass, A ;
Wright, AR ;
Iyer, RB ;
Lynch, P ;
Sivak, MV ;
Butler, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1713-1719
[9]   Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy [J].
Dafnis, G ;
Granath, F ;
Påhlman, L ;
Ekbom, A ;
Blomqvist, P .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2005, 37 (02) :113-118
[10]  
Debatin JF, 1999, ENDOSCOPY, V31, P174