Rheological, sensorial and volatile profiles of synbiotic kefirs produced from cow and goat milk containing varied probiotics in combination with fructooligosaccharide

被引:22
作者
Buran, Ilkay [1 ]
Akal, Ceren [1 ]
Ozturkoglu-Budak, Sebnem [1 ]
Yetisemiyen, Atila [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Dept Dairy Technol, Fac Agr, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Kefir; Probiotic; Fructooligosaccharide; Cow milk; Goat milk; BUFFALO MILK; LACTOBACILLUS-ACIDOPHILUS; BACTERIA; YOGURT; CHEESE; SURVIVAL; QUALITY; WHEY; PARAMETERS; PREBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111591
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium bifidum Bb-11 accompanied with fructooligosaccharide (FOS) were used individually to develop a synbiotic kefir from cow and goat milk. Influence of milk type, as well as the probiotic strain was evaluated on the physicochemical, rheological, sensory, volatile flavor properties and probiotic viabilities of kefirs during 28d of storage. The results of this study highlight, L. acidophilus in combination with FOS had a supportive effect on the content of acetaldehyde, probiotics viability and overall sensory appreciation of samples at the end of storage. Particularly, cow milk kefir produced with Lb. acidophilus was found to be more effective on acetaldehyde formation (17.4 ppm mean value). Furthermore, cow milk favored the sensory properties of kefirs than goat milk. In conclusion, cow milk kefir supplemented with Lb. acidophilus and FOS was more appreciated. With regard to probiotic counts and rheological properties, while goat milk supported the survival of probiotics, cow milk had a positive effect on consistency index of samples. Therefore, these ingredients which could be used to provide synbiotic effect in kefirs could be preferred according to the targeted feature to meet the customer satisfaction by enhancing the aspects of products such as rheology, flavor and probiotic content.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, DET MILK FAT GERB ME DET MILK FAT GERB ME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COW MILK RAW STANDAR COW MILK RAW STANDAR
[3]   A review: chemical, microbiological and nutritional characteristics of kefir [J].
Arslan, Seher .
CYTA-JOURNAL OF FOOD, 2015, 13 (03) :340-345
[4]   Functional kefir production from high pressure homogenized hazelnut milk [J].
Atalar, Ilyas .
LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 107 :256-263
[5]  
Atamer M., 1987, Gda, V12, P213
[6]   Comparison of chemical, rheological and sensory properties of kefir produced by kefir grains and commercial kefir starter [J].
Barukcic, Irena ;
Gracin, Leo ;
Jambrak, Anet Rezek ;
Bozanic, Rajka .
MLJEKARSTVO, 2017, 67 (03) :169-176
[7]   Pure cultures for making kefir [J].
Beshkova, DM ;
Simova, ED ;
Simov, ZI ;
Frengova, GI ;
Spasov, ZN .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (05) :537-544
[8]  
Bodyfelt F., 1988, The sensory evaluation of dairy products
[9]   Study of proteolysis, lipolysis and volatile profile of a traditional Greek goat cheese (Xinotyri) during ripening [J].
Bontinis, Th G. ;
Mallatou, H. ;
Pappa, E. C. ;
Massouras, Th ;
Alichanidis, E. .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2012, 105 (1-3) :193-201
[10]   Influence of culture activity on aroma components in yoghurts produced from goat's and cow's milk [J].
Bozanic, R ;
Tratnik, L ;
Hruskar, M .
ACTA ALIMENTARIA, 2003, 32 (02) :151-160