Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: Proposal of new computed tomography response criteria

被引:1180
作者
Choi, Haesun
Charnsangavej, Chuslip
Faria, Silvana C.
Macapinlac, Homer A.
Burgess, Michael A.
Patel, Shreyaskumar R.
Chen, Lei L.
Podoloff, Donald A.
Benjamin, Robert S.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Diagnost Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Sarcoma Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3049
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are insensitive in evaluating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with imatinib. This study evaluates whether computed tomography (CT) findings of GIST after imatinib treatment correlate with tumor responses by [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography ( PET) and develops reliable, quantitative, CT response criteria. Patients and Methods A total of 172 lesions selected by RECIST were evaluated in 40 patients with metastatic GISTs treated with imatinib. All patients had pretreatment and 2-month follow-up CTs and FDG-PETs. Multivariate analysis was performed using tumor size and density (Hounsfield unit [HU]) on CT and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on FDG-PET. Patients were observed up to 28 months. Results Mean baseline tumor size and density on CT were 5.3 cm and 72.8 HU, respectively, and mean baseline SUV(max) on FDG-PET was 5.8. Thirty-three patients had good response on FDG-PET. A decrease in tumor size of more than 10% or a decrease in tumor density of more than 15% on CT had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100% in identifying PET responders versus 52% and 100% by RECIST. Good responders on CT at 2 months had significantly longer time to progression than those who did not respond ( P =.01). Conclusion Small changes in tumor size or density on CT are sensitive and specific methods of assessing the response of GISTs. If the prognostic value of our proposed CT response criteria can be confirmed prospectively, the criteria should be employed in future studies of patients with GIST.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1759
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ACKERMANS SURG PATHO
  • [2] Antoch G, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P357
  • [3] Buchdunger E, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P100
  • [4] CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: A quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings
    Choi, H
    Charnsangavej, C
    Faria, SD
    Tamm, EP
    Benjamin, RS
    Johnson, MM
    Macapinlac, HA
    Podoloff, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (06) : 1619 - 1628
  • [5] CHOI H, 2002, RAD SOC N AM SCI PRO
  • [6] CHOI H, 2003, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V22, P819
  • [7] Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer
    Faivre, S
    Delbaldo, C
    Vera, K
    Robert, C
    Lozahic, S
    Lassau, N
    Bello, C
    Deprimo, S
    Brega, A
    Massimini, G
    Armand, JP
    Scigalla, P
    Raymond, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [8] Imatinib mesylate for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: best monitored with FDG PET
    Jager, PL
    Gietema, JA
    van der Graaf, WTA
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 25 (05) : 433 - 438
  • [9] Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
    Joensuu, H
    Roberts, PJ
    Sarlomo-Rikala, M
    Andersson, LC
    Tervahartiala, P
    Tuveson, D
    Silberman, SL
    Capdeville, R
    Dimitrijevic, S
    Druker, B
    Demetri, GD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (14) : 1052 - 1056
  • [10] KARNOFSKY D, 1961, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V2, P709