Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres

被引:38
作者
Kohestani, Kimia [1 ,2 ]
Wallstrom, Jonas [3 ,4 ]
Dehlfors, Niclas [4 ]
Sponga, Ole Martin [5 ]
Mansson, Marianne [1 ]
Josefsson, Andreas [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Carlsson, Sigrid [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Hellstrom, Mikael [3 ,4 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Region Vastra Gotaland, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Region Vastra Gotaland, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Carlanderska Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Urol & Androl, Umea, Sweden
[7] Umea Univ, Wallenberg Ctr Mol Med, Umea, Sweden
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY USA
[9] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; radical prostatectomy; interobserver agreement; observer variation;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2019.1675757
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Despite the growing trend to embrace pre-biopsy MRI in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PC), its performance and inter-observer variability outside high-volume centres remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate sensitivity of and variability between readers of prostate MRI outside specialized units with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen as the reference standard. Materials and methods: Retrospective study comprising a consecutive cohort of all 97 men who underwent MRI and subsequent RP between January 2012 and December 2014 at a private hospital in Sweden. Three readers, blinded to clinical data, reviewed all images (including 11 extra prostate MRI to reduce bias). A tumour was considered detected if the overall PI-RADS v2 score was 3-5 and there was an approximate match (same or neighbouring sector) of tumour sector according to a 24 sector system used for both MRI and whole mount sections. Results: Detection rate for the index tumour ranged from 67 to 76%, if PI-RADS 3-5 lesions were considered positive and 54-66% if only PI-RADS score 4-5 tumours were included. Detection rate for aggressive tumours (GS >= 4+3) was higher; 83.1% for PI-RADS 3-5 and 79.2% for PI-RADS 4-5. The agreement between readers showed average j values of 0.41 for PI-RADS score 3-5 and 0.51 for PI-RADS score 4-5. Conclusions: Prostate MRI evidenced a moderate detection rate for clinically significant PC with a rather large variability between readers. Clinics outside specialized units must have knowledge of their performance of prostate MRI before considering omitting biopsies in men with negative MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 311
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]  
[Anonymous], STAT CANC INC 2016 S
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT VARDPR PROST 201
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, AJR AM J ROENTGENOL
[5]   What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate [J].
Borofsky, Samuel ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Gaur, Sonia ;
Bernardo, Marcelino ;
Greer, Matthew D. ;
Mertan, Francesca V. ;
Taffel, Myles ;
Moreno, Vanesa ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (01) :186-195
[6]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[7]   Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Hamoen, Esther H. J. ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) :343-351
[8]   Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer [J].
Draisma, G ;
Boer, R ;
Otto, SJ ;
van der Cruijsen, IW ;
Damhuis, RAM ;
Schröder, FH ;
de Koning, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) :868-878
[9]   Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Steliarova-Foucher, E. ;
Lortet-Tieulent, J. ;
Rosso, S. ;
Coebergh, J. W. W. ;
Comber, H. ;
Forman, D. ;
Bray, F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (06) :1374-1403
[10]   Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
De Visschere, Pieter ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Thoeny, Harriet ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Villers, Arnauld .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) :1045-1053