An environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Living Wall Systems

被引:39
作者
Oquendo-Di Cosola, V. [1 ,2 ]
Olivieri, F. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz-Garcia, L. [2 ,3 ]
Bacenetti, J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Construct & Technol Architecture, ETS Arquitectura, Avda Juan de Herrera 4, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Innovat & Technol Dev Ctr, Av Complutense S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Agroforestry Engn, Av Complutense S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Living Wall Systems; Life Cycle Assessment; Sustainability; Green walls; GREEN FACADES; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; VEGETATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109743
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standard approach for evaluating the environmental impacts of products and processes. This paper presents the LCA of Living Wall Systems (LWS), a new technology for greening the building envelope and improve sustainability. Impacts of manufacture, operation, and use of the systems selected, were evaluated through an LCA. LWS are closely related to several environmental benefits, including improved air quality, increased biodiversity, mitigation of heat island effects, and reduced energy consumption due to savings in indoor cooling and heating. Two prototypes have been selected, taking into account the modularity and the use of organic substrate as selection criteria. The systems evaluated were a plastic-based modular system and a felt-based modular system. The inventory data was gathered through the manufacturers. The LCA approach has been used to assess the impact of these solutions by focusing on the construction phase and its contribution to both the energy balance and the entire life cycle of a building. This approach has never been done before for LWS. The study found that out of the two systems through the manufacturing, construction, and maintenance stage of the LCA, the felt-based LWS has an impact on almost 100% of the impact categories analyzed, while plastic-based LWS has the lowest influence on the total environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EcoHestia: A comprehensive building environmental assessment scheme, based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE, 2017, 38 : 515 - 521
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment Model of a Catering Product: Comparing Environmental Impacts for Different End-of-Life Scenarios
    Avato, Judit Lovasne
    Mannheim, Viktoria
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)
  • [43] Life cycle environmental impacts of urban water systems in China
    Xu, Hao
    Fu, Guangtao
    Ye, Qian
    Lyu, Mei
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 266
  • [44] Life Cycle Assessment as a tool for environmental management
    J. R. Stewart
    M. W. Collins
    R. Anderson
    W. R. Murphy
    [J]. Clean Products and Processes, 1999, 1 (2): : 73 - 81
  • [45] The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Dairy Products
    Uctug, Fehmi Gorkem
    [J]. FOOD ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2019, 11 (02) : 104 - 121
  • [46] Use of life cycle assessment in environmental management
    Ross, S
    Evans, D
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 29 (01) : 132 - 142
  • [47] The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Dairy Products
    Fehmi Görkem Üçtuğ
    [J]. Food Engineering Reviews, 2019, 11 : 104 - 121
  • [48] The use of life cycle assessment in environmental management
    Stuart Ross
    David Evans
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 (3) : 190 - 190
  • [49] Environmental life cycle assessment of the microfiltration process
    Tangsubkul, N.
    Parameshwaran, K.
    Lundie, S.
    Fane, A. G.
    Waite, T. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 284 (1-2) : 214 - 226
  • [50] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413