An environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Living Wall Systems

被引:39
作者
Oquendo-Di Cosola, V. [1 ,2 ]
Olivieri, F. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz-Garcia, L. [2 ,3 ]
Bacenetti, J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Construct & Technol Architecture, ETS Arquitectura, Avda Juan de Herrera 4, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Innovat & Technol Dev Ctr, Av Complutense S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Agroforestry Engn, Av Complutense S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Living Wall Systems; Life Cycle Assessment; Sustainability; Green walls; GREEN FACADES; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; VEGETATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109743
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standard approach for evaluating the environmental impacts of products and processes. This paper presents the LCA of Living Wall Systems (LWS), a new technology for greening the building envelope and improve sustainability. Impacts of manufacture, operation, and use of the systems selected, were evaluated through an LCA. LWS are closely related to several environmental benefits, including improved air quality, increased biodiversity, mitigation of heat island effects, and reduced energy consumption due to savings in indoor cooling and heating. Two prototypes have been selected, taking into account the modularity and the use of organic substrate as selection criteria. The systems evaluated were a plastic-based modular system and a felt-based modular system. The inventory data was gathered through the manufacturers. The LCA approach has been used to assess the impact of these solutions by focusing on the construction phase and its contribution to both the energy balance and the entire life cycle of a building. This approach has never been done before for LWS. The study found that out of the two systems through the manufacturing, construction, and maintenance stage of the LCA, the felt-based LWS has an impact on almost 100% of the impact categories analyzed, while plastic-based LWS has the lowest influence on the total environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental life cycle assessment of algae systems: Critical review of modelling approaches
    Braud, L.
    McDonnell, K.
    Murphy, F.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 179
  • [32] Dynamic life cycle economic and environmental assessment of residential solar photovoltaic systems
    Ren, Mingcheng
    Mitchell, Clayton R.
    Mo, Weiwei
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 722 (722)
  • [33] Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment
    Dourmad, J. Y.
    Ryschawy, J.
    Trousson, T.
    Bonneau, M.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Houwers, H. W. J.
    Hviid, M.
    Zimmer, C.
    Nguyen, T. L. T.
    Morgensen, L.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) : 2027 - 2037
  • [34] Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems
    Shi, Yilei
    Zhou, Lu
    Xu, Yangyu
    Zhou, Hongjie
    Shi, Lei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 196 : 1188 - 1197
  • [35] Review of impact categories and environmental indicators for life cycle assessment of geotechnical systems
    Raymond, Alena J.
    Tipton, James R.
    Kendall, Alissa
    DeJong, Jason T.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (03) : 473 - 484
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment to support the quantification of the environmental impacts of an event
    Toniolo, Sara
    Mazzi, Anna
    Fedele, Andrea
    Aguiari, Filippo
    Scipioni, Antonio
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 : 12 - 22
  • [37] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of partition walls: Innovative prefabricated systems vs conventional construction
    Meireles, Ines
    Martin-Gamboa, Mario
    Sousa, Vitor
    Kalthoum, Ahmad
    Dufour, Javier
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 12
  • [38] Environmental life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of domestic hot water systems in China
    Liu, Wei
    Chen, Cheng
    Wu, Huijuan
    Guo, Chunhui
    Chen, Yuedong
    Liu, Wenqiu
    Cui, Zhaojie
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 199
  • [39] Is aquaponics good for the environment?-evaluation of environmental impact through life cycle assessment studies on aquaponics systems
    Greenfeld, Asael
    Becker, Nir
    Bornman, Janet F.
    Spatari, Sabrina
    Angel, Dror L.
    AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 30 (01) : 305 - 322
  • [40] Swiss Agricultural Life Cycle Assessment: A method to assess the emissions and environmental impacts of agricultural systems and products
    Nemecek, Thomas
    Roesch, Andreas
    Bystricky, Maria
    Jeanneret, Philippe
    Lansche, Jens
    Stussi, Martin
    Gaillard, Gerard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (03) : 433 - 455