Toxicological risk assessment and prioritization of drinking water relevant contaminants of emerging concern

被引:105
作者
Baken, Kirsten A. [1 ]
Sjerps, Rosa M. A. [1 ]
Schriks, Merijn [1 ,3 ]
van Wezel, Annemarie P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, Groningenhaven 7, NL-3433 PE Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vitens Drinking Water Co, Oude Veerweg 1, NL-8019 BE Zwolle, Netherlands
关键词
Contaminants of emerging concern; Chemical water quality screening; Human health risk assessment; (Provisional) drinking water guideline values; Threshold of Toxicological Concern; CONCERN TTC; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; CRAMER CLASSIFICATION; SURFACE WATERS; THRESHOLD; SUBSTANCES; CHEMICALS; PHARMACEUTICALS; DATABASE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Toxicological risk assessment of contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) in (sources of) drinking water is required to identify potential health risks and prioritize chemicals for abatement or monitoring. In such assessments, concentrations of chemicals in drinking water or sources are compared to either (i) health-based (statutory) drinking water guideline values, (ii) provisional guideline values based on recent toxicity data in absence of drinking water guidelines, or (iii) generic drinking water target values in absence of toxicity data. Here, we performed a toxicological risk assessment for 163 CEC that were selected as relevant for drinking water. This relevance was based on their presence in drinking water and/or groundwater and surface water sources in downstream parts of the Rhine and Meuse, in combination with concentration levels and physicochemical properties. Statutory and provisional drinking water guideline values could be derived from publically available toxicological information for 142 of the CEC. Based on measured concentrations it was concluded that the majority of substances do not occur in concentrations which individually pose an appreciable human health risk. A health concern could however not be excluded for vinylchloride, trichloroethene, bromodichloromethane, aniline, phenol, 2-chlorobenzenamine, mevinphos, 1,4-dioxane, and nitrolotriacetic acid. For part of the selected substances, toxicological risk assessment for drinking water could not be performed since either toxicity data (hazard) or drinking water concentrations (exposure) were lacking. In absence of toxicity data, the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach can be applied for screening level risk assessment. The toxicological information on the selected substances was used to evaluate whether drinking water target values based on existing TTC levels are sufficiently protective for drinking water relevant CEC. Generic drinking water target levels of 37 mu g/L for Cramer class I substances and 4 mu g/L for Cramer class III substances in drinking water were derived based on these CEC. These levels are in line with previously reported generic drinking water target levels based on original TTC values and are shown to be protective for health effects of the majority of contaminants of emerging concern evaluated in the present study. Since the human health impact of many chemicals appearing in the water cycle has been studied insufficiently, generic drinking water target levels are useful for early warning and prioritization of CEC with unknown toxicity in drinking water and its sources for future monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 303
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality
[2]   Scientific Opinion on Exploring options for providing advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) [J].
Antunovic, Boris ;
Barlow, Susan ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Jeger, Michael -John ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Lovell, David ;
Norrung, Birgit ;
Pratt, Iona ;
Mortensen, Alicia ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Smulders, Frans ;
Varmier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)
[3]   Exposure-triggered reproductive toxicity testing under the REACH legislation: A proposal to define significant/relevant exposure [J].
Bernauer, Ulrike ;
Heinemeyer, Gerhard ;
Heinrich-Hirsch, Barbara ;
Ulbrich, Beate ;
Gundert-Remy, Ursula .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 176 (01) :68-76
[4]   Synthetic chemicals as agents of global change [J].
Bernhardt, Emily S. ;
Rosi, Emma J. ;
Gessner, Mark O. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 (02) :84-90
[5]   Scientific Opinion on Evaluation of the Toxicological Relevance of Pesticide Metabolites for Dietary Risk Assessment [J].
Boesten, Jos ;
Bolognesi, Claudia ;
Brock, Theo ;
Capri, Ettore ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Hart, Andrew ;
Hirsch-Ernst, Karen Ildico ;
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard ;
Klein, Michael ;
Luttik, Robert ;
Machera, Kyriaki ;
Moretto, Angelo ;
Ossendorp, Bernadette ;
Petersen, Annette ;
Pico, Yolanda ;
Schaeffer, Andreas ;
Sousa, Paulo ;
Steurbaut, Walter ;
Stromberg, Anita ;
Tasheva, Maria ;
van der Linden, Ton ;
Vleminckx, Christiane .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)
[6]   Toxicological Relevance of Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water [J].
Bruce, Gretchen M. ;
Pleus, Richard C. ;
Snyder, Shane A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (14) :5619-5626
[7]   TTC-based risk assessment of tetrachlorobutadienes and pentachlorobutadienes - The in vitro genotoxic contaminants in ground and drinking water [J].
Brueschweiler, Beat J. .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 58 (02) :341-344
[8]   A tiered approach to threshold of regulation [J].
Cheeseman, MA ;
Machuga, EJ ;
Bailey, AB .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 37 (04) :387-412
[9]  
CRAMER GM, 1978, FOOD COSMET TOXICOL, V16, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0015-6264(76)80522-6
[10]   Screening and human health risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and their transformation products in Dutch surface waters and drinking water [J].
de Jongh, Cindy M. ;
Kooij, Pascal J. F. ;
de Voogt, Pim ;
ter Laak, Thomas L. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 427 :70-77