Motivation and performance in context: The influence of goal orientations and instructional setting on situational appraisals and task performance

被引:71
作者
Niemivirta, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Collegium Adv Studies, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
goal orientation; situational motivation; person-centered approach; instructional context;
D O I
10.2117/psysoc.2002.250
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine how students with different goal orientation patterns perform in a complex problem solving task under different instructional conditions. Ninth-grade students (N=143) performed a complex problem solving task after receiving either task-involving or ego-involving instructions. It was assumed that students emphasizing performance and avoidance goals (or both) would produce less positive situational appraisals than students emphasizing learning goals, and that these differences would be greater in the ego-involving condition. Consistent with the assumptions, higher levels of interest and self-efficacy were associated with the task-involving condition, while more self-handicaps were claimed in the ego-involving condition. Also as expected, the detrimental consequences of the ego-involving condition were most accentuated for performance-oriented students. In general, the results support the idea of multiple goals and multiple pathways. That is, students with different goal orientation patterns experienced task situations differently - even with no differences in their performance - and the degree and quality of these differences varied as a function of the instructional condition.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 270
页数:21
相关论文
共 73 条
[2]   ACHIEVEMENT GOALS IN THE CLASSROOM - STUDENTS LEARNING-STRATEGIES AND MOTIVATION PROCESSES [J].
AMES, C ;
ARCHER, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 80 (03) :260-267
[3]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, LATENT GOLD USERS GU
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[6]   Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models [J].
Barron, KE ;
Harackiewicz, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (05) :706-722
[7]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[8]  
BERGMAN LR, 1998, METHODS MODELS STUDY, P38
[9]   Effects of test anxiety, information organization, and testing situation on performance on two test formats [J].
Birenbaum, M ;
Pinku, P .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 22 (01) :23-38
[10]  
Boekaerts M., 2000, Handbook of Self-Regulation, P417, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50042-1, 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50042-1]