Vasectomy by epithelial curettage without suture or cautery: a pilot study in humans

被引:4
作者
Amory, John K. [1 ]
Jessen, John W.
Muller, Charles [2 ]
Berger, Richard E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Med, Ctr Res Reprod & Contracept, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
male contraception; male sterilization; re-canalization; spermatogenesis; vas deferens; vasectomy failure; UNITED-STATES; ACCEPTABILITY; PREGNANCY; RATES;
D O I
10.1038/aja.2009.94
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Curettage of the epithelium of the vas deferens might be a safe and effective method of male sterilization. We conducted a pilot study of vasectomy by epithelial curettage with a novel microcurette called the Vas-X in 12 normal men requesting elective sterilization. Seminal fluid analysis was obtained monthly after the procedure for 6 months. Pain was assessed by questionnaire. Three months after the procedure, all men attained sperm concentrations of less than 0.2 million sperm per mL, and seven were azoospermic. Post-procedural pain was minimal. Nine men ultimately achieved and maintained azoospermia; however, 4 to 6 months after the procedure, sperm concentrations increased in three of the 12 subjects, necessitating repeat vasectomy. Microscopic examination of the vas deferens from these failures revealed re-canalization. Vasectomy by epithelial curettage can result in effective sterilization; however, 1/4 of the subjects were not effectively sterilized by the procedure due to re-canalization of the vas deferens. Epithelial curettage will require further refinement to determine if it is a viable form of vasectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Andonian S, 2002, J ANDROL, V23, P691
[2]  
Barone Mark A, 2004, BMC Urol, V4, P10
[3]   Vasectomy follow-up: Clinical significance of rare nonmotile sperm in postoperative semen analysis [J].
Chawla, A ;
Bowles, B ;
Zini, A .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (06) :1212-1215
[4]   Pregnancy rates after vasectomy: a survey of US urologists [J].
Deneux-Tharaux, C ;
Kahn, E ;
Nazerali, H ;
Sokal, DC .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (05) :401-406
[5]   Determining the success of vasectomy [J].
Dhar, NB ;
Bhatt, A ;
Jones, JS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (04) :773-776
[6]   Contraceptive failure rates: New estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth [J].
Fu, HS ;
Darroch, JE ;
Haas, T ;
Ranjit, N .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1999, 31 (02) :56-63
[7]   Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995 [J].
Haws, JM ;
Morgan, GT ;
Pollack, AE ;
Koonin, LM ;
Magnani, RJ ;
Gargiullo, PM .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :685-691
[8]   The risk of pregnancy after vasectomy [J].
Jamieson, DJ ;
Costello, C ;
Trussell, J ;
Hillis, SD ;
Marchbanks, PA ;
Peterson, HB .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) :848-850
[9]  
Labrecque Michel, 2006, BMC Urol, V6, P25
[10]   THE NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY [J].
LI, SQ ;
GOLDSTEIN, M ;
ZHU, J ;
HUBER, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (02) :341-344