Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: The Hong Kong experience

被引:427
作者
Kam, MKM
Teo, PML
Chau, RMC
Cheung, KY
Choi, PHK
Kwan, WH
Leung, SF
Zee, B
Chan, ATC
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 05期
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; IMRT; dose escalation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the primary treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), including the role of dose escalation above 66 Gy level. Methods and Materials: Between July 2000 and September 2002, 63 newly diagnosed NPC patients were treated with IMRT. The disease was Stage I in 9 (14%), Stage II in 18 (29%), Stage III in 22 (35%), and Stage IV in 14 (22%). The prescribed dose was 66 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and positive neck nodes, 60 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV), and 54-60 Gy to the clinically negative neck. All 20 (100%) patients with T1-2a tumors received intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB) boost, and 15/42 (36%) patients with T2b-T4 tumors received conformal boost (8 Gy/4 fractions). Nineteen patients with advanced stage disease also received either neoadjuvant or concurrent chemotherapy. Acute and late normal tissue effects were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS), nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: With a median follow-up of 29 months (range 8-45 months), 4 patients developed local in-field failure, 1 patient developed regional relapse, and 13 patients developed distant metastases. All 4 patients with local failure had either T3 or T4 disease before primary treatment and did not have ICB or conformal boost. The 3-year actuarial LRFS, NRFS, DMFS, and OS were 92%, 98%, 79%, and 90%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that dose escalation above 66 Gy was significantly associated with better PFS and DMFS, whereas GTV size was a significant adverse factor for OS. The worst acute mucositis was Grade 1 or 2 in 36 (59%), and Grade 3 in 25 (41%) patients. Acute dysphagia requiring tube feeding occurred in 5 (8%) patients. The proportion of patients with Grade 2-3 xerostomia was 57% at 3 months, and 23% at 2 years after IMRT. Within the subset of patients with a mean parotid dose of <31 Gy, the proportions with Grade 2-3 xerostomia were 30% and 17% at 3 months and 2 years, respectively. Conclusion: Our experience of using IMRT in the primary treatment of NPC showed a very high rate of locoregional control and favorable toxicity profile. Furthermore, we found that dose escalation above 66 Gy of IMRT-based therapy was a significant determinant of progression-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival for advanced T-stage tumors. Distant metastases represent the predominant mode of treatment failure. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1440 / 1450
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: Phase III randomized intergroup study 0099
    Al-Sarraf, M
    LeBlanc, M
    Giri, PGS
    Fu, KK
    Cooper, J
    Vuong, T
    Forastiere, AA
    Adams, G
    Sakr, WA
    Schuller, DE
    Ensley, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (04) : 1310 - 1317
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, MAN STAG CANC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, ICRU report 50, DOI 10.1118/1.597396
  • [4] In-depth evaluation of the AJCC/UICC 1997 staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Prognostic homogeneity and proposed refinements
    Au, JSK
    Law, CK
    Foo, W
    Lau, WH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (02): : 413 - 426
  • [5] Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: A new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Butler, EB
    Teh, BS
    Grant, WH
    Uhl, BM
    Kuppersmith, RB
    Chiu, JK
    Donovan, DT
    Woo, SY
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (01): : 21 - 32
  • [6] Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Progression-free survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial
    Chan, ATC
    Teo, PML
    Ngan, RK
    Leung, TW
    Lau, WH
    Zee, B
    Leung, SF
    Cheung, FY
    Yeo, W
    Yiu, HH
    Yu, KH
    Chiu, KW
    Chan, DT
    Mok, T
    Yuen, KT
    Mo, F
    Lai, M
    Kwan, WH
    Choi, P
    Johnson, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (08) : 2038 - 2044
  • [7] A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: Initial results
    Chao, KSC
    Deasy, JO
    Markman, J
    Haynie, J
    Perez, CA
    Purdy, JA
    Low, DA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04): : 907 - 916
  • [8] Comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Cheng, JCH
    Chao, KSC
    Low, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 96 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [9] TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC)
    COX, JD
    STETZ, J
    PAJAK, TF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05): : 1341 - 1346
  • [10] Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    Ten Haken, RK
    Kim, HM
    Marsh, LH
    Ship, JA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03): : 577 - 587