How Local Landholder Groups Collectively Manage Weeds in South-Eastern Australia

被引:29
作者
Graham, Sonia [1 ]
Rogers, Sarah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Contemporary Chinese Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Invasive species; Collective action; Rural land use; Local environment group; Farmer group; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL DILEMMAS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE; LANDCARE; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-017-0859-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For two decades researchers and policy makers have been arguing that community-based collective action is needed to effectively control weeds. Yet there has been little social research into the ways that collective weed control emerges at local scales. The aim of this paper is to investigate the mechanisms through which three local landholder groups in south-eastern Australia collectively manage weeds and the measures they use to evaluate success. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of three Landcare groups-Jerrawa Creek/Upper Lachlan, MacLaughlin River and Towamba Valley-as well as government staff external to the groups. The results reveal that for all three groups collective weed control is about supporting individual weed control efforts as well as proactively engaging landholders with the worst infestations. The groups were seen to be successful because they focused on the common challenge that weeds pose to all landholders, thereby removing the shame associated with having weeds, and because they organised community events that were as much about building and maintaining social relationships as improving weed control. Groups were positive about what they had achieved as collectives of landholders, but also saw an important role for government in providing funding, engaging with landholders who were unwilling to engage directly with the group, and controlling weeds on public lands.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 408
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   Can legislation improve the effectiveness of fox control in NSW? [J].
McLeod, L. J. ;
Saunders, G. R. .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (04) :248-259
[32]   Social Norms and Natural Resource Management in a Changing Rural Community [J].
Minato, Wendy ;
Curtis, Allan ;
Allan, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2010, 12 (04) :381-403
[33]   Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value [J].
Morse, Ricardo S. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (02) :231-245
[34]   A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes [J].
Muro, M. ;
Jeffrey, P. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (03) :325-344
[35]   Motivating residents to combat invasive species on private lands: social norms and community reciprocity [J].
Niemiec, Rebecca M. ;
Ardoin, Nicole M. ;
Wharton, Candace B. ;
Asner, Gregory P. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (02)
[36]  
NSW NRC, 2014, WEEDS TIM GET SER RE
[37]  
NSW NRC, 2016, SHAR PROBL IN PRESS
[38]   Analyzing collective action [J].
Ostrom, Elinor .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 :155-166
[39]   Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change [J].
Ostrom, Elinor .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (04) :550-557
[40]   Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations [J].
Pelling, Mark ;
High, Chris ;
Dearing, John ;
Smith, Denis .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2008, 40 (04) :867-884