Ethical considerations in prehospital ambulance based research: qualitative interview study of expert informants

被引:14
作者
Armstrong, Stephanie [1 ]
Langlois, Adele [2 ]
Siriwardena, Niroshan [3 ]
Quinn, Tom [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lincoln, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[2] Univ Lincoln, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[3] Univ Lincoln, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Community & Hlth Res Unit, Primary & Prehosp Healthcare, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[4] Kingston Univ, Emergency Cardiovasc & Crit Care Res Grp, 6th Floor,Hunter Wing,Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England
[5] St Georges Univ London, 6th Floor,Hunter Wing,Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
United Kingdom; Ambulance; Clinical trials; Ethics; Consent; Expert interviews; Paramedics; EMERGENCY RESEARCH; COMMUNITY CONSULTATION; PATIENTS EXPERIENCES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CONSENT; EXCEPTION; ENROLLMENT; TRAUMA; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-019-0425-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Prehospital ambulance based research has unique ethical considerations due to urgency, time limitations and the locations involved. We sought to explore these issues through interviews with experts in this research field. Methods We undertook semi-structured interviews with expert informants, primarily based in the UK, seeking their views and experiences of ethics in ambulance based clinical research. Participants were questioned regarding their experiences of ambulance based research, their opinions on current regulations and guidelines, and views about their general ethical considerations. Participants were chosen because they were actively involved in, or in their expert capacity (e.g. law) expressed an interest in, ambulance based research. Results Fourteen participants were interviewed including principal investigators, researchers, ethicists and medical lawyers. Five major themes were identified: Capacity, Consent, Clinical Considerations, Consultation and Regulation. Questions regarding consent and capacity were foremost in the discussions as all participants highlighted these as areas for concern. The challenges and use of multiple consent models reflected the complexity of research in this environment. The clinical theme referred to the role of paramedics in research and how research involving ambulance services is increasingly informing improvements to patient care and outcomes and reducing the burden on hospital services. Most felt that, although current regulations were fit for purpose, more specific guidance on implementing these in the ambulance setting would be beneficial. This related closely to the theme of consultation, which examined the key role of ethics committees and other regulatory bodies, as well as public engagement. Conclusions By interviewing experts in research or ethics in this setting we were able to identify key concerns and highlight areas for future development such as improved guidance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Views of Paramedics on Their Role in an Out-of-Hospital Ambulance-Based Trial in Ultra-Acute Stroke: Qualitative Data From the Rapid Intervention With Glyceryl Trinitrate in Hypertensive Stroke Trial (RIGHT) [J].
Ankolekar, Sandeep ;
Parry, Ruth ;
Sprigg, Nikola ;
Siriwardena, A. Niroshan ;
Bath, Philip M. W. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 64 (06) :640-648
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, BUILDING EVIDENCE BA
[3]   Assessment of consent models as an ethical consideration in the conduct of prehospital ambulance randomised controlled clinical trials: a systematic review [J].
Armstrong, Stephanie ;
Langlois, Adele ;
Laparidou, Despina ;
Dixon, Mark ;
Appleton, Jason P. ;
Bath, Philip M. ;
Snooks, Helen ;
Siriwardena, A. Niroshan .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
[4]   Never, always and maybe. Addressing attitudes of patients towards emergency medicine research [J].
Biros, Michelle .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (06) :374-375
[5]   Balancing Ethical Goals in Challenging Individual Participant Scenarios Occurring in a Trial Conducted with Exception from Informed Consent [J].
Biros, Michelle H. ;
Dickert, Neal W. ;
Wright, David W. ;
Scicluna, Victoria M. ;
Harney, Deneil ;
Silbergleit, Robert ;
Denninghoff, Kurt ;
Pentz, Rebecca D. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (03) :340-346
[6]   Does Community Consultation Matter? [J].
Biros, Michelle H. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (01) :104-105
[7]   How do patients feel about taking part in clinical trials in emergency care? [J].
Buckley, Joseph M. ;
Irving, Andy D. ;
Goodacre, Steve .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (06) :376-380
[8]   Exploring ethical conflicts in emergency trauma research: The COMBAT (Control of Major Bleeding after Trauma) study experience [J].
Chin, Theresa L. ;
Moore, Ernest E. ;
Coors, Marilyn E. ;
Chandler, James G. ;
Ghasabyan, Arsen ;
Harr, Jeffrey N. ;
Stringham, John R. ;
Ramos, Christopher R. ;
Ammons, Sarah ;
Banerjee, Anirban ;
Sauaia, Angela .
SURGERY, 2015, 157 (01) :10-19
[9]   Guide to the design and review of emergency research when it is proposed that consent and consultation be waived [J].
Davies, Hugh ;
Shakur, Haleema ;
Padkin, Andrew ;
Roberts, Ian ;
Slowther, Anne-Marie ;
Perkins, Gavin D. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (10) :794-795
[10]   Patients' Perspectives of Enrollment in Research Without Consent: The Patients' Experiences in Emergency Research-Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury Study [J].
Dickert, Neal W. ;
Scicluna, Victoria M. ;
Baren, Jill M. ;
Biros, Michelle H. ;
Fleischman, Ross J. ;
Govindarajan, Prasanthi R. ;
Jones, Elizabeth B. ;
Pancioli, Arthur M. ;
Wright, David W. ;
Pentz, Rebecca D. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (03) :603-612