Predictors of sexual offence recidivism in offenders with intellectual disabilities

被引:60
|
作者
Lindsay, WR
Elliot, SF
Astell, A
机构
[1] Univ Abertay, NHS Tayside, State Hosp, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
intellectual disability; recidivism; sexual offence;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00217.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Background The extensive research on prediction of risk in offenders has developed a number of reliable static risk predictors. There is also a developing body of work on proximal, dynamic risk factors and their importance in predicting violent and sexual offending. Although this work has not been done specifically on offenders with intellectual disabilities, there is some preliminary evidence that it is equally relevant in this field. The current study extends this work. Method Fifty-two sexual offenders and abusers were included as participants and 18 of them had re-offended or were strongly suspected of having re-offended. A checklist of static and dynamic factors were derived from the literature and clinical experience and a retrospective, correlational method was employed. Two respondents provided information on the presence or absence of each variable and this information was checked through extensive case records. These variables were correlated with re-offending and suspicion of re-offending. Results Several variables correlated significantly with the two dependent variables and a standard multiple regression investigated the predictive quality of each independent variable. Significant variables were allowances made by staff, antisocial attitude, poor relationship with mother, denial of crime, sexual abuse in childhood, erratic attendance and poor response to treatment. Certain variables, found significant in earlier studies, did not emerge in the current analysis. These predictors accounted for around 53% of the variance for evidence of re-offending and around 74% of the variance for suspicion of re-offending. Conclusions The variables which emerge are similar to those found in the mainstream offender literature. Some hypotheses are presented on why certain variables did not emerge. Like other similar studies, the results should be treated with caution because of retrospective bias.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 305
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism
    van der Put, C. E.
    Asscher, J. J.
    Stams, G. J. J. M.
    Moonen, X. M. H.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2014, 58 (11) : 992 - 1003
  • [22] Predictors of recidivism for adolescent offenders in a Singapore sample
    Ang, Rebecca P.
    Huan, Vivien S.
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2008, 35 (07) : 895 - 905
  • [23] An evaluation of the applicability of the self-regulation model to sexual offenders with intellectual disabilities
    Ford, Hannah J.
    Rose, John
    Thrift, Sue
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 20 (03): : 440 - 457
  • [24] Sexual Offenders With Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Comparison Study in an Incarcerated US Sample
    Callahan, Perry A.
    Jeglic, Elizabeth L.
    Calkins, Cynthia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2024, 68 (10-11) : 1052 - 1073
  • [25] Sexual offenders recidivism: the difficulty to define reality
    Mezzo, B
    Gravier, B
    MEDECINE ET HYGIENE, 2001, 59 (2339): : 659 - +
  • [26] Denial predicts recidivism for some sexual offenders
    Nunes, Kevin L.
    Hanson, R. Karl
    Firestone, Philip
    Moulden, Heather M.
    Greenberg, David M.
    Bradford, John M.
    SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 19 (02) : 91 - 105
  • [27] Juvenile offenders with and without disabilities: Risks and patterns of recidivism
    Zhang, Dalun
    Barrett, David E.
    Katsiyannis, Antonis
    Yoon, Myeongsun
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 21 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [28] RECIDIVISM OF SEXUAL OFFENDERS - RE-APPRAISAL
    SOOTHILL, KL
    GIBBENS, TCN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 1978, 18 (03): : 267 - 276
  • [29] Recidivism Risk Assessment for Adult Sexual Offenders
    Brian J. Holoyda
    William J. Newman
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2016, 18
  • [30] Comparison of Measures of Risk for Recidivism in Sexual Offenders
    Looman, Jan
    Abracen, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2010, 25 (05) : 791 - 807