Real Options Analysis of Adaptation to Changing Flood Risk: Structural and Nonstructural Measures

被引:35
作者
Hino, Miyuki [1 ]
Hall, Jim W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, 473 Via Ortega,Y2E2 Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Climate & Environm Risks, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
来源
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING | 2017年 / 3卷 / 03期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Real options; Flood risk; Adaptation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1061/AJRUA6.0000905
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Real options analysis provides a means of appraising the benefits of introducing or preserving flexibility in flood risk-management decisions. Building in optionality can help to create flood risk-management strategies that are robust to a range of possible future conditions. Real options analysis has therefore been attracting increasing attention as an approach to climate change-adaptation decision making, and in particular for adapting flood-protection infrastructure to the uncertain impacts of climate change. Here, a methodology is presented for analyzing real options in flood risk management, which considers the joint effects of uncertainties in socioeconomic drivers of floodplain vulnerability as well as the uncertain effects of climate change on future flood frequency. Decision makers at future time steps in the sequential decision problem are taken to be rational optimizers who benefit from improved information about these two uncertain factors, compared with the present day. The sensitivity of two archetypical flood risk-management decisions to uncertainty, both in future river flows and to socioeconomic change, is demonstrated. In the first, a flood protection dike can be built with a widened base, providing the option to heighten it at a later date, or it can be built to a fixed height with no further options apart from costly reconstruction. In the second problem, a portion of undeveloped, flood-prone land separates an existing development from the river. A decision can be made to purchase the land and forgo development. A real options analysis is used to identify the circumstances in which it is cost beneficial to purchase the land, which depends on the value of existing assets exposed to flooding and how that value would change were development to take place. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Structural measures versus flood mapping in risk management in urban areas: The case of the Barranco de las Ovejas (Alicante, Spain)
    Olcina Cantos, Jorge
    Oliva Canizares, Antonio
    CUADERNOS GEOGRAFICOS, 2020, 59 (02): : 199 - 220
  • [42] Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data
    Muis, Sanne
    Gueneralp, Burak
    Jongman, Brenden
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    Ward, Philip J.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 538 : 445 - 457
  • [43] Value-at-risk analysis for real options in complex engineered systems
    Hassan, R
    de Neufville, R
    McKinnon, D
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOL 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 3697 - 3704
  • [44] Agriculture Adaptation Options for Flood Impacts under Climate Change-A Simulation Analysis in the Dajia River Basin
    Li, Hsin-Chi
    Hsiao, Yi-Hua
    Chang, Chia-Wei
    Chen, Yung-Ming
    Lin, Lee-Yaw
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [45] Flood Risk Analysis by Building Use in Urban Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation
    Yu, Insang
    Park, Kiyong
    Lee, Eui Hoon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (23)
  • [46] Synthetic impact response functions for flood vulnerability analysis and adaptation measures in coastal zones under changing climatic conditions: a case study in Gippsland coastal region, Australia
    Dushmanta Dutta
    Wendy Wright
    Philip Rayment
    Natural Hazards, 2011, 59 : 967 - 986
  • [47] Synthetic impact response functions for flood vulnerability analysis and adaptation measures in coastal zones under changing climatic conditions: a case study in Gippsland coastal region, Australia
    Dutta, Dushmanta
    Wright, Wendy
    Rayment, Philip
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2011, 59 (02) : 967 - 986
  • [48] Non-structural flood risk mitigation under developing country conditions: an analysis on the determinants of willingness to pay for flood insurance in rural Pakistan
    Abbas, Azhar
    Amjath-Babu, T. S.
    Kachele, Harald
    Mueller, Klaus
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 75 (03) : 2119 - 2135
  • [49] Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse
    Poussin, J. K.
    Bubeck, P.
    Aerts, J. C. J. H.
    Ward, P. J.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 12 (11) : 3455 - 3471
  • [50] A Hybrid Process to Address Uncertainty and Changing Climate Risk in Coastal Areas Using Dynamic Adaptive Pathways Planning, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis & Real Options Analysis: A New Zealand Application
    Lawrence, Judy
    Bell, Robert
    Stroombergen, Adolf
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)