Real Options Analysis of Adaptation to Changing Flood Risk: Structural and Nonstructural Measures

被引:36
|
作者
Hino, Miyuki [1 ]
Hall, Jim W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, 473 Via Ortega,Y2E2 Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Climate & Environm Risks, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
来源
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING | 2017年 / 3卷 / 03期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Real options; Flood risk; Adaptation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1061/AJRUA6.0000905
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Real options analysis provides a means of appraising the benefits of introducing or preserving flexibility in flood risk-management decisions. Building in optionality can help to create flood risk-management strategies that are robust to a range of possible future conditions. Real options analysis has therefore been attracting increasing attention as an approach to climate change-adaptation decision making, and in particular for adapting flood-protection infrastructure to the uncertain impacts of climate change. Here, a methodology is presented for analyzing real options in flood risk management, which considers the joint effects of uncertainties in socioeconomic drivers of floodplain vulnerability as well as the uncertain effects of climate change on future flood frequency. Decision makers at future time steps in the sequential decision problem are taken to be rational optimizers who benefit from improved information about these two uncertain factors, compared with the present day. The sensitivity of two archetypical flood risk-management decisions to uncertainty, both in future river flows and to socioeconomic change, is demonstrated. In the first, a flood protection dike can be built with a widened base, providing the option to heighten it at a later date, or it can be built to a fixed height with no further options apart from costly reconstruction. In the second problem, a portion of undeveloped, flood-prone land separates an existing development from the river. A decision can be made to purchase the land and forgo development. A real options analysis is used to identify the circumstances in which it is cost beneficial to purchase the land, which depends on the value of existing assets exposed to flooding and how that value would change were development to take place. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STATE OPTIONS FOR NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.
    Royer, Jack P.
    Report - Water Resources Research Institute of The University of North Carolina, 1983, (196):
  • [2] Evaluation of adaptation options to flood risk in a probabilistic framework
    Kheradmand, Saeideh
    Seidou, Ousmane
    Konte, Diawoye
    Batoure, Mahaman Bohari Barmou
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2018, 19 : 1 - 16
  • [3] Global-scale benefit-cost analysis of coastal flood adaptation to different flood risk drivers using structural measures
    Tiggeloven, Timothy
    de Moel, Hans
    Winsemius, Hessel C.
    Eilander, Dirk
    Erkens, Gilles
    Gebremedhin, Eskedar
    Loaiza, Andres Diaz
    Kuzma, Samantha
    Luo, Tianyi
    Iceland, Charles
    Bouwman, Arno
    van Huijstee, Jolien
    Ligtvoet, Willem
    Ward, Philip J.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (04) : 1025 - 1044
  • [4] Risk reduction measures: adaptation and integration of the concept into risk analysis of flood protection systems
    Beullac, B.
    Tourment, R.
    Gumez, F.
    3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FLOODRISK 2016), 2016, 7
  • [5] FLOOD DAMAGE MITIGATION - A REVIEW OF STRUCTURAL AND NONSTRUCTURAL MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE DECISION FRAMEWORKS
    THAMPAPILLAI, DJ
    MUSGRAVE, WF
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1985, 21 (04) : 411 - 424
  • [6] Benefits and Limitations of Real Options Analysis for the Practice of River Flood Risk Management
    Kind, Jarl M.
    Baayen, Jorn H.
    Botzen, W. J. Wouter
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2018, 54 (04) : 3018 - 3036
  • [7] Neglecting property-level flood risk adaptation measures lead to overestimation in flood risk analysis - An empirical study
    Rindsfuser, Nele
    Mosimann, Markus
    Ernst, Sibilla
    Keiler, Margreth
    Zischg, Andreas Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2025, 119
  • [8] Real Options in flood risk management decision making
    Woodward, M.
    Gouldby, B.
    Kapelan, Z.
    Khu, S. -T.
    Townend, I.
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 4 (04): : 339 - 349
  • [9] Timing is (almost) everything: Real options, extreme value theory, climate adaptation, and flood risk management
    Truong, Chi
    Malavasi, Matteo
    Goldstein, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
  • [10] FLOOD DAMAGE MITIGATION: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURAL AND NONSTRUCTURAL MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE DECISION FRAMEWORKS.
    Thampapillai, Dodo J.
    Musgrave, Warren F.
    Water Resources Research, 1985, 21 (04): : 411 - 424