Practical aspects of vaccination of poultry against avian influenza virus

被引:32
作者
Spackman, Erica [1 ]
Pantin-Jackwood, Mary J. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Southeast Poultry Res Lab, Athens, GA 30605 USA
关键词
Avian influenza; Vaccination; Poultry; Domestic fowl; Turkey; Domestic duck; VACCINES PROTECT CHICKENS; MATERNAL ANTIBODY; LOW-PATHOGENICITY; LIMITED PROTECTION; GENETIC EVOLUTION; NORTH-AMERICA; COLD STRESS; H5N1; OUTBREAK; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.09.017
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Although little has changed in vaccine technology for avian influenza virus (AIV) in the past 20 years, the approach to vaccination of poultry (chickens, turkeys and ducks) for avian influenza has evolved as highly pathogenic AIV has become endemic in several regions of the world. Vaccination for low pathogenicity AIV is also becoming routine in regions where there is a high level of field challenge. In contrast, some countries will not use vaccination at all and some will only use it on an emergency basis during eradication efforts (i.e. stamping-out). There are pros and cons to each approach and, since every outbreak situation is different, no one method will work equally well in all situations. Numerous practical aspects must be considered when developing an AIV control program with vaccination as a component, such as: (1) the goals of vaccination must be defined; (2) the population to be vaccinated must be clearly identified; (3) there must be a plan to obtain and administer good quality vaccine in a timely manner and to achieve adequate coverage with the available resources; (4) risk factors for vaccine failure should be mitigated as much as possible; and, most importantly, (5) biosecurity must be maintained as much as possible, if not enhanced, during the vaccination period. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] H7 avian influenza virus vaccines protect chickens against challenge with antigenically diverse isolates
    Abbas, Muhammad Athar
    Spackman, Erica
    Fouchier, Ron
    Smith, Derek
    Ahmed, Zaheer
    Siddique, Naila
    Sarmento, Luciana
    Naeem, Khalid
    McKinley, Enid T.
    Hameed, Abdul
    Rehmani, Shafqat
    Swayne, David E.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2011, 29 (43) : 7424 - 7429
  • [2] Genetic drift evolution under vaccination pressure among H5N1 Egyptian isolates
    Abdel-Moneim, Ahmed S.
    Afifi, Manal A.
    El-Kady, Magdy F.
    [J]. VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 8
  • [3] Low-pathogenicity H7N2 avian influenza ity outbreak in Virginia during 2002
    Akey, BL
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2003, 47 : 1099 - 1103
  • [4] BEARD CW, 1970, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V42, P779
  • [5] Highly pathogenic H7N7 avian influenza in Italy
    Bonfanti, L.
    Monne, I.
    Tamba, M.
    Santucci, U.
    Massi, P.
    Patregnani, T.
    Piccolomini, L. Loli
    Natalini, S.
    Ferri, G.
    Cattoli, G.
    Marangon, S.
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2014, 174 (15) : 382 - +
  • [6] Field trial for assessment of avian influenza vaccination effectiveness in Indonesia
    Bouma, A.
    Muljono, A. Teguh
    Jatikusumah, A.
    Nell, A. J.
    Mudjiartiningsih, S.
    Dharmayanti, I.
    Siregar, E. Sawitri
    Claassen, I.
    Koch, G.
    Stegeman, J. A.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2008, 27 (03): : 633 - 642
  • [7] IMPAIRED RESPONSE TO KILLED NEWCASTLE-DISEASE VACCINE IN CHICKEN POSSESSING CIRCULATING ANTIBODY TO CHICKEN ANEMIA AGENT
    BOX, PG
    HOLMES, HC
    BUSHELL, AC
    FINNEY, PM
    [J]. AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1988, 17 (03) : 713 - 723
  • [8] Brown IH, 2007, DEV BIOLOGICALS, V130, P33
  • [9] REEVALUATION OF THE PATHOGENICITY OF A/CHICKEN ALABAMA 75 (H4N8) INFLUENZA-VIRUS
    BRUGH, M
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 1992, 36 (04) : 968 - 974
  • [10] Development and use of Fowlpox vectored Vaccines for avian influenza
    Bublot, Michel
    Pritchard, Nikki
    Swayne, David E.
    Selleck, Paul
    Karaca, Kemal
    Suarez, David L.
    Audonnet, Jean-Christophe
    Mickle, Thomas R.
    [J]. IMPACT OF EMERGING ZOONOTIC DISEASES ON ANIMAL HEALTH, 2006, 1081 : 193 - 201