Anaplasma marginale inactivated vaccine:: dose titration against a homologous challenge

被引:21
作者
Rodríguez, SD
Ortiz, MAG
Salgado, GH
Cerda, NAS
Torres, RA
Alarcón, GJC
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Queretaro, Fac Ciencias Nat, Queretaro, Mexico
[3] SAGAR, INIFAR, Ctr Nacl Invest Disciplinarias Fisiol, Ajuchitlan, Mexico
关键词
Anaplasma marginale; inactivated vaccine; dose-titration; initial bodies; homologous challenge; bovines;
D O I
10.1016/S0147-9571(99)00076-4
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The present study was performed to dose-titrate an Anaplasma marginale experimental immunogen derived from partially purified initial bodies from three geographically different Mexican strains. Three five-bovine groups were inoculated twice on days zero and 21 with A. marginale initial bodies equivalent to 1.5 x 10(10) (group I), 3 x 10(10) (group II) or 6 x 10(10) (group III) infected erythrocytes mixed with STDCM(R) adjuvant, A similar group served as non-vaccinated controls. All four groups were challenged with 1 x 10(8) infected erythrocytes from a donor cow with an increasing rickettsemia of strain MEX-15 on day 87 post-vaccination. The prepatent period was very similar for all four groups. All five nonvaccinated controls presented typical acute anaplasmosis syndrome reaching a mean of 30.9% rickettsemia and a loss of 73.4% in the packed cell volume (PCV). Two of five controls died of acute anaplasmosis, Within the vaccinated groups only one animal (group II) suffered acute disease and died, Although all the other vaccinated animals were free of clinical signs, they developed very low rickettsemias (3.2, 3.8 and 4.3%) and PCV losses of 49.9, 47.8, and 49.3% for groups I, II and III. The starting mean weight was very similar for all four groups. All animals lost weight following challenge but losses for groups I and II were lower and significantly different from group IV losses (P less than or equal to 0.1). Although there were no significant differences among vaccinated groups, group III was more severely affected. Taken altogether, these results show a 93.3% protection against both illness and death for all groups; and 100% protection for groups I and III, and 80% for group II. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 252
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
AMERAULT TE, 1967, AM J VET RES, V28, P1067
[2]   VACCINATION WITH ANAPLASMA-CENTRALE - RESPONSE AFTER AN EXPERIMENTAL CHALLENGE WITH ANAPLASMA-MARGINALE [J].
ANZIANI, OS ;
TARABLA, HD ;
FORD, CA ;
GALLETO, C .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 1987, 19 (02) :83-87
[3]   CD4+ T-lymphocyte and immunoglobulin G2 responses in calves immunized with Anaplasma marginale outer membranes and protected against homologous challenge [J].
Brown, WC ;
Shkap, V ;
Zhu, DM ;
McGuire, TC ;
Tuo, WB ;
McElwain, TF ;
Palmer, GH .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1998, 66 (11) :5406-5413
[4]   The repertoire of Anaplasma marginale antigens recognized by CD4+ T-lymphocyte clones from protectively immunized cattle is diverse and includes major surface protein 2 (MSP-2) and MSP-3 [J].
Brown, WC ;
Zhu, DM ;
Shkap, V ;
McGuire, TC ;
Blouin, EF ;
Kocan, KM ;
Palmer, GH .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1998, 66 (11) :5414-5422
[5]   Bovine type I and type 2 responses [J].
Brown, WC ;
Rice-Ficht, AC ;
Estes, DM .
VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 63 (1-2) :45-55
[6]  
BUDDEN JR, 1977, AM J VET RES, V38, P633
[7]  
CAMARILLO SDR, 1999, TEC PECU MEX, V37, P1
[8]  
*CONASA, 1995, MEM 4 REUN ANN 14 17, P79
[9]  
CORRIER DE, 1980, AM J VET RES, V41, P1062
[10]  
DENNIS RA, 1970, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V156, P1861