Affective State Recognition in Livestock-Artificial Intelligence Approaches

被引:21
作者
Neethirajan, Suresh [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Anim Sci Dept, Adaptat Physiol Grp, Farmworx, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
ANIMALS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
animal emotions; animal welfare; sensors; animal-based measures; affective states; emotion modelling; EMOTION RECOGNITION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FARM-ANIMALS; DAIRY-COWS; BEHAVIOR; STRESS; WELFARE; CHALLENGES; CLIMATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/ani12060759
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Emotions or affective states recognition in farm animals is an underexplored research domain. Despite significant advances in animal welfare research, animal affective state computing through the development and application of devices and platforms that can not only recognize but interpret and process the emotions, are in a nascent stage. The analysis and measurement of unique behavioural, physical, and biological characteristics offered by biometric sensor technologies and the affiliated complex and large data sets, opens the pathway for novel and realistic identification of individual animals amongst a herd or a flock. By capitalizing on the immense potential of biometric sensors, artificial intelligence enabled big data methods offer substantial advancement of animal welfare standards and meet the urgent needs of caretakers to respond effectively to maintain the wellbeing of their animals. Farm animals, numbering over 70 billion worldwide, are increasingly managed in large-scale, intensive farms. With both public awareness and scientific evidence growing that farm animals experience suffering, as well as affective states such as fear, frustration and distress, there is an urgent need to develop efficient and accurate methods for monitoring their welfare. At present, there are not scientifically validated 'benchmarks' for quantifying transient emotional (affective) states in farm animals, and no established measures of good welfare, only indicators of poor welfare, such as injury, pain and fear. Conventional approaches to monitoring livestock welfare are time-consuming, interrupt farming processes and involve subjective judgments. Biometric sensor data enabled by artificial intelligence is an emerging smart solution to unobtrusively monitoring livestock, but its potential for quantifying affective states and ground-breaking solutions in their application are yet to be realized. This review provides innovative methods for collecting big data on farm animal emotions, which can be used to train artificial intelligence models to classify, quantify and predict affective states in individual pigs and cows. Extending this to the group level, social network analysis can be applied to model emotional dynamics and contagion among animals. Finally, 'digital twins' of animals capable of simulating and predicting their affective states and behaviour in real time are a near-term possibility.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 155 条
  • [51] Ekman R., 1997, WHAT FACE REVEALS BA
  • [52] Depression and emotion regulation predict objective smartphone use measured over one week
    Elhai, Jon D.
    Tiamiyu, Mojisola F.
    Weeks, Justin W.
    Levine, Jason C.
    Picard, Kristina J.
    Hall, Brian J.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 133 : 21 - 28
  • [53] Costs and Benefits of Improving Farm Animal Welfare
    Fernandes, Jill N.
    Hemsworth, Paul H.
    Coleman, Grahame J.
    Tilbrook, Alan J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 14
  • [54] Personality Research in Mammalian Farm Animals: Concepts, Measures, and Relationship to Welfare
    Finkemeier, Marie-Antonine
    Langbein, Jan
    Puppe, Birger
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [55] Social network properties predict chronic aggression in commercial pig systems
    Foister, Simone
    Doeschl-Wilson, Andrea
    Roehe, Rainer
    Arnott, Gareth
    Boyle, Laura
    Turner, Simon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [56] Evaluating the temporal and situational consistency of personality traits in adult dairy cattle
    Foris, Borbala
    Zebunke, Manuela
    Langbein, Jan
    Melzer, Nina
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [57] Fote F. N., 2020, 2020 5 INT C CLOUD C, P1
  • [58] Fraser D, 1997, ANIM WELFARE, V6, P187
  • [59] Positive and negative contexts predict duration of pig vocalisations
    Friel, Mary
    Kunc, Hansjoerg P.
    Griffin, Kym
    Asher, Lucy
    Collins, Lisa M.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [60] A systematic literature review on the use of machine learning in precision livestock farming
    Garcia, Rodrigo
    Aguilar, Jose
    Toro, Mauricio
    Pinto, Angel
    Rodriguez, Paul
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 179