Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

被引:89
作者
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hou, Yunbing [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Pengtao [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass; Co-firing; Environmental impact; LCA; CCS; COMBUSTION POWER-PLANT; CARBON CAPTURE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; OPPORTUNITIES; TORREFACTION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; ECONOMICS; CCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a carbon-neutral renewable energy source, biomass co-firing with coal contributes to reducing the carbon intensity of pulverized coal power plants with CO2 capture and storage; thus, this process significantly reduces the greenhouse gas emissions of the power industry. However, various types of environmental impacts caused by co-firing have hindered the large-scale deployment of this technology. In this study, ten life cycle assessment models were developed based on the Integrated Environmental Control Model and GaBi software to quantify the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co-firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The system boundaries included raw material acquisition, raw material transport, energy conversion of power plants, CCS and brine treatment. The results indicated that a pulverized biomass/coal co-firing power plant with CCS can achieve nearzero emissions at a co-firing ratio of 25% and negative emissions of 877 kg CO2-e/MWh from a life-cycle perspective when coal is totally replaced. Co-firing biomass and coal in power plants has a passive impact on seven environmental categories, such as the eutrophication potential and toxicity potential, rather than on the global warming potential, abiotic resource depletion potential and acidification potential. The major causes of environmental burden shifting are energy penalties and indirect emissions from high-energy-consumption processes, especially emissions of N2O, NH3 and ethylene oxide released during biomass extraction and solvent preparation. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this paper may have implications for deep decarbonization in other industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Retrofitting coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and carbon capture and storage for net zero carbon emission: A plant-by-plant assessment framework
    Wang, Rui
    Chang, Shiyan
    Cui, Xueqin
    Li, Jin
    Ma, Linwei
    Kumar, Amit
    Nie, Yaoyu
    Cai, Wenjia
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2021, 13 (01): : 143 - 160
  • [42] Life cycle energy-economic-CO2 emissions evaluation of biomass/coal, with and without CO2 capture and storage, in a pulverized fuel combustion power plant in the United Kingdom
    Yi, Qun
    Zhao, Yingjie
    Huang, Yi
    Wei, Guoqiang
    Hao, Yanhong
    Feng, Jie
    Mohamed, Usama
    Pourkashanian, Mohamed
    Nimmo, William
    Li, Wenying
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 : 258 - 272
  • [43] Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO2 Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
    An, Jing
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Li, Yingnan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [44] Co-firing plants with retrofitted carbon capture and storage for power-sector emissions mitigation
    Fan, Jing-Li
    Fu, Jingying
    Zhang, Xian
    Li, Kai
    Zhou, Wenlong
    Hubacek, Klaus
    Urpelainen, Johannes
    Shen, Shuo
    Chang, Shiyan
    Guo, Siyue
    Lu, Xi
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (08) : 807 - +
  • [45] Biomass co-firing in a pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) combined cycle power plant: A techno-environmental assessment based on computational simulations
    Huang, Y.
    McIlveen-Wright, D.
    Rezvani, S.
    Wang, Y. D.
    Hewitt, N.
    Williams, B. C.
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 87 (10) : 927 - 934
  • [46] Utilization of CO2 in renewable DME fuel production: A life cycle analysis (LCA)-based case study in China
    Tomatis, Marco
    Parvez, Ashak Mahmud
    Afzal, Muhammad T.
    Mareta, Sannia
    Wu, Tao
    He, Jun
    He, Tianbiao
    FUEL, 2019, 254
  • [47] Process-based life cycle CO2 assessment of an ammonia-based carbon capture and storage system
    Kim, Yoori
    Lim, Seong-Rin
    Jung, Kyung A.
    Park, Jong Moon
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2019, 76 : 223 - 232
  • [48] Life Cycle Modelling of Alternative Gas-fuelled Power Plants with CO2 Capture and Storage
    Nie, Zhenggang
    Korre, Anna
    Durucan, Sevket
    24TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS A AND B, 2014, 33 : 985 - 990
  • [49] Environmental impact assessment of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies applied to cement production plants
    Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian
    Petrescu, Letitia
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 320
  • [50] Part-load performance of direct-firing and co-firing of coal and biomass in a power generation system integrated with a CO2 capture and compression system
    Ali, Usman
    Akram, Muhammad
    Font-Palma, Carolina
    Ingham, Derek B.
    Pourkashanian, Mohamed
    FUEL, 2017, 210 : 873 - 884