Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

被引:89
|
作者
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hou, Yunbing [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Pengtao [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass; Co-firing; Environmental impact; LCA; CCS; COMBUSTION POWER-PLANT; CARBON CAPTURE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; OPPORTUNITIES; TORREFACTION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; ECONOMICS; CCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a carbon-neutral renewable energy source, biomass co-firing with coal contributes to reducing the carbon intensity of pulverized coal power plants with CO2 capture and storage; thus, this process significantly reduces the greenhouse gas emissions of the power industry. However, various types of environmental impacts caused by co-firing have hindered the large-scale deployment of this technology. In this study, ten life cycle assessment models were developed based on the Integrated Environmental Control Model and GaBi software to quantify the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co-firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The system boundaries included raw material acquisition, raw material transport, energy conversion of power plants, CCS and brine treatment. The results indicated that a pulverized biomass/coal co-firing power plant with CCS can achieve nearzero emissions at a co-firing ratio of 25% and negative emissions of 877 kg CO2-e/MWh from a life-cycle perspective when coal is totally replaced. Co-firing biomass and coal in power plants has a passive impact on seven environmental categories, such as the eutrophication potential and toxicity potential, rather than on the global warming potential, abiotic resource depletion potential and acidification potential. The major causes of environmental burden shifting are energy penalties and indirect emissions from high-energy-consumption processes, especially emissions of N2O, NH3 and ethylene oxide released during biomass extraction and solvent preparation. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this paper may have implications for deep decarbonization in other industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of Taean coal power plant with CO2 capture module
    Jung, Han Sol
    Ryoo, Seung Gul
    Kang, Yong Tae
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 357
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment of a Co-Firing Power Generation System in China
    Wu, Jinzhuo
    Kong, Linlin
    Wang, Lihai
    Sun, Yaqi
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [23] Should Life Cycle Assessment be part of the Environmental Impact Assessment? Case study: EIA of CO2 capture and storage in Canada
    Manuilova, Anastassia
    Suebsiri, Jitsopa
    Wilson, Malcolm
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 4511 - 4518
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia
    Shafie, S. M.
    Mahlia, T. M. I.
    Masjuki, H. H.
    ENERGY, 2013, 57 : 284 - 294
  • [25] Influence of gas and detrimental metal emissions from biomass firing and co-firing on environmental impact
    Demirbas, A
    ENERGY SOURCES, 2005, 27 (15): : 1419 - 1428
  • [26] Investigation on the Synergetic Effect of Biomass Co-Firing in the Atmosphere of O2/CO2
    Wang, Xuebin
    Hu, Zhongfa
    Deng, Shuanghui
    Wang, Yibing
    Wei, Bo
    Tan, Houzhang
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2014, 8 (05) : 481 - 488
  • [27] Techno-economic study of biomass co-firing with and without CO2 capture in an Australian black coal-fired power plant
    Khorshidi, Zakieh
    Ho, Minh T.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 6035 - 6042
  • [28] Life Cycle Assessment Based Process Design of CO2 Capture Options
    Tock, Laurence
    Marechal, Francois
    24TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS A AND B, 2014, 33 : 1033 - 1038
  • [29] Cost and CO2 reduction of biomass co-firing using waste wood biomass in Tohoku region, Japan
    Furubayashi, Takaaki
    Nakata, Toshihiko
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 1044 - 1053
  • [30] Co-firing in coal power plants and its impact on biomass feedstock availability
    Dumortier, Jerome
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 : 396 - 405