Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

被引:89
|
作者
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hou, Yunbing [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Pengtao [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass; Co-firing; Environmental impact; LCA; CCS; COMBUSTION POWER-PLANT; CARBON CAPTURE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; OPPORTUNITIES; TORREFACTION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; ECONOMICS; CCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a carbon-neutral renewable energy source, biomass co-firing with coal contributes to reducing the carbon intensity of pulverized coal power plants with CO2 capture and storage; thus, this process significantly reduces the greenhouse gas emissions of the power industry. However, various types of environmental impacts caused by co-firing have hindered the large-scale deployment of this technology. In this study, ten life cycle assessment models were developed based on the Integrated Environmental Control Model and GaBi software to quantify the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co-firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The system boundaries included raw material acquisition, raw material transport, energy conversion of power plants, CCS and brine treatment. The results indicated that a pulverized biomass/coal co-firing power plant with CCS can achieve nearzero emissions at a co-firing ratio of 25% and negative emissions of 877 kg CO2-e/MWh from a life-cycle perspective when coal is totally replaced. Co-firing biomass and coal in power plants has a passive impact on seven environmental categories, such as the eutrophication potential and toxicity potential, rather than on the global warming potential, abiotic resource depletion potential and acidification potential. The major causes of environmental burden shifting are energy penalties and indirect emissions from high-energy-consumption processes, especially emissions of N2O, NH3 and ethylene oxide released during biomass extraction and solvent preparation. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this paper may have implications for deep decarbonization in other industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage
    Schakel, Wouter
    Meerman, Hans
    Talaei, Alireza
    Ramirez, Andrea
    Faaij, Andre
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 131 : 441 - 467
  • [2] Life cycle cost assessment of biomass co-firing power plants with CO2 capture and storage considering multiple incentives
    Yang, Bo
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    Liu, Lan-Cui
    Hou, Yun-Bing
    Zhang, Kun
    Yang, Lai
    Feng, Ye
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 96
  • [3] The impact of biomass quality and quantity on the performance and economics of co-firing plants with and without CO2 capture
    Khorshidi, Zakieh
    Ho, Minh T.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 21 : 191 - 202
  • [4] The environmental perspective on biomass co-firing operations at coal-fired power plants in the Banten region, Indonesia: a life cycle approach
    Febijanto, Irhan
    Rosmeika, Rosmeika
    Nadirah, Nadirah
    Yanuar, Ahmad Ismed
    Sihombing, Adolf Leopold
    Susila, I. Made Agus Dharma
    Bahua, Hismiaty
    Kurniawati, Inna Zulfa
    Barkah, Arief
    Santoso, Arif Dwi
    Herdioso, Rudi
    Rustianto, Bambang
    Oktaufik, M. A. M.
    Suryana, Yaya
    Syamsudin, Edy
    Aditiyawan, Aditiyawan
    Gazali, Nizam
    Soedjati, Dadi
    Soleh, Mochamad
    ENERGY ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 9 (04) : 439 - 454
  • [5] Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area
    Kommalapati, Raghava Rao
    Hossan, Iqbal
    Botlaguduru, Venkata Sai Vamsi
    Du, Hongbo
    Huque, Ziaul
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [6] Environmental impact of an agro-waste based polygeneration without and with CO2 storage: Life cycle assessment approach
    Jana, Kuntal
    De, Sudipta
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 216 : 931 - 940
  • [7] A framework for environmental assessment of CO2 capture and storage systems
    Sathre, Roger
    Chester, Mikhail
    Cain, Jennifer
    Masanet, Eric
    ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 540 - 548
  • [8] Techno-economic evaluation of co-firing biomass gas with natural gas in existing NGCC plants with and without CO2 capture
    Khorshidi, Zakieh
    Florin, Nick H.
    Ho, Minh T.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 49 : 343 - 363
  • [9] Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture
    Cebrucean, Dumitru
    Cebrucean, Viorica
    Ionel, Ioana
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (01) : 153 - 169
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of co-firing coal and wood waste for bio-energy with carbon capture and storage - New South Wales study
    Weihs, G. A. Fimbres
    Jones, J. S.
    Ho, M.
    Malik, R. H.
    Abbas, A.
    Meka, W.
    Fennell, P.
    Wiley, D. E.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 273