Alcohol-based surgical hand preparation: translating scientific evidence into clinical practice

被引:14
作者
Gaspar, Gilberto G. [1 ,6 ]
Menegueti, Mayra G. [1 ]
Lopes, Ana Elisa R. [1 ]
Santos, Roberto O. C. [2 ]
de Araujo, Thamiris R. [3 ]
Nassiff, Aline [3 ]
Ferreira, Lecio R. [1 ]
Dallora, Maria Eulalia L. V. [4 ]
Canini, Silvia R. M. S. [3 ]
Bellissimo-Rodrigues, Fernando [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Hosp, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Infect Control Serv, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Surg & Anat, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Dept Fundamental Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Hosp, Hosp Adm, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Social Med Dept, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Hosp, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Ave Bandeirantes,3900 Vila Monte Alegre, BR-14048900 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
HYGIENE; SCRUB;
D O I
10.1186/s13756-018-0372-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Although alcohol-based surgical hand preparation offers potential advantages over the traditional surgical scrubbing technique, implementing it may be challenging due to resistance of surgeons in changing their practice. We aimed to implement alcohol-based surgical hand preparation in the hospital setting evaluating the impact of that on the quality and duration of the procedure, as well as on the prevention of surgical site infections. Methods: A quasi-experimental study conducted at a tertiary-care university hospital from April 01 to November 01, 2017. Participants were cardiac and orthopedic surgical teams (n = 56) and patients operated by them (n = 231). Intervention consisted of making alcohol-based handrub available in the operating room, convincing and training surgical teams for using it, promoting direct observation of surgical hand preparation, and providing aggregated feedback on the quality of the preparation. The primary study outcome was the quality of the surgical hand preparation, inferred by the compliance with each one of the steps predicted in the World Health Organization (WHO) technique, evaluated through direct observation. Secondary study outcome was the patient's individual probability of developing surgical site infection in both study periods. We used the Wilcoxon for paired samples and McNemar's test to assess the primary study outcome and we build a logistic regression model to assess the secondary outcome. Results: We observed 534 surgical hand preparation events. Among 33 participants with full data available for both study periods, we observed full compliance with all the steps predicted in the WHO technique in 0.03% (1/33) of them in the pre-intervention period and in 36.36% (12/33) of them in the intervention period (OR: 12.0, 95% CI: 2. 4-59.2, p = 0.002). Compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention reduced the duration of the preparation (4.8 min vs 2.7 min, respectively; p < 0.001). The individual risk of developing a surgical site infection did not significantly change between the pre-intervention and the intervention phase (Adjusted RR = 0.66; 95% CI 0. 16-2.70, p = 0.563). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that, when compared to the traditional surgical scrub, alcohol-based surgical hand preparation improves the quality and reduces the duration of the preparation, being at least equally effective for the prevention of surgical site infections.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care is Safer Care, DOI DOI 10.1086/600379
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, IMPLEMENTATION RES H
[3]   In vivo comparative efficacy of three surgical hand preparation agents in reducing bacterial count [J].
Barbadoro, P. ;
Martini, E. ;
Savini, S. ;
Marigliano, A. ;
Ponzio, E. ;
Prospero, E. ;
D'Errico, M. M. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2014, 86 (01) :64-67
[4]   Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force [J].
Boyce, JM ;
Pittet, D .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (12) :S3-S40
[5]   Antibacterial effects on dry-fast and traditional water-based surgical scrubbing methods: A two-time points experimental study [J].
Chen, Shu-Hwa ;
Chou, Chuan-Yu ;
Huang, Jui-Chen ;
Tang, Ya-Fen ;
Kuo, Yur-Ren ;
Chien, Li-Yu .
NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 16 (02) :179-185
[6]  
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2013, POINT PREV SURV HEAL
[7]  
Gonçalves Karen de Jesus, 2012, Rev. esc. enferm. USP, V46, P1484
[8]  
Graf ME, 2014, J BRAS EC SA UDE, V6, P71
[9]   Chlorhexidine is not an essential component in alcohol-based surgical hand preparation: a comparative study of two handrubs based on a modified EN 12791 test protocol [J].
Hennig, Thomas-Jorg ;
Werner, Sebastian ;
Naujox, Kathrin ;
Arndt, Andreas .
ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2017, 6
[10]   Surgical hand scrubs in relation to microbial counts: systematic literature review [J].
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang ;
Chiu, Hua-Hsien ;
Lee, Feng-Ping .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 55 (01) :68-78