Perspectives of Rare Disease Social Media Group Participants on Engaging With Genetic Counselors: Mixed Methods Study

被引:5
作者
Yabumoto, Megan [1 ]
Miller, Emily [2 ]
Rao, Anoushka [2 ]
Tabor, Holly K. [2 ,3 ]
Ormond, Kelly E. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Halley, Meghan C. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Genet, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Biomed Ethics, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Eidgenoss TH Zurich, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Hlth Ethics & Policy Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Biomed Ethics, Sch Med, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
social media; rare disease; genetic counseling; genetics; genomics; delivery of health care; HEALTH; PROFESSION; PATIENT; FUTURE; ERA;
D O I
10.2196/42084
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Social media provides a potential avenue for genetic counselors to address gaps in access to reliable genetics information for rare disease communities. However, only limited research has examined patient and family attitudes toward engaging with genetic counselors through social media. Objective: Our study assessed the attitudes of members of rare disease social media groups toward engaging with genetic counselors through social media, characteristics associated with greater interest, and the benefits and potential pitfalls of various approaches to such engagement. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods survey of patients and family members recruited from a systematic sample of rare disease Facebook groups. Patient characteristics and their associations with interest in engagement with genetic counselors were evaluated using univariate and bivariate statistics. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: In total, 1053 individuals from 103 rare disease groups participated. The median overall interest in engaging with genetic counselors on social media was moderately high at 7.0 (IQR 4.0-9.0, range 0-10). No past experience with a genetic counselor was associated with greater interest in engaging with one through social media (mu=6.5 vs 6.0, P=.04). Participants expressed greatest interest (median 9.0, IQR 5.0-10.0) in engagement models allowing direct communication with genetic counselors, which was corroborated by the majority (n=399, 61.3%) of individuals who responded to open-ended questions explicitly stating their interest in 1-on-1 interactions. When asked what forms of support they would request from genetic counselors through social media, participants desired individualized support and information about how to access services. However, participants also expressed concerns regarding privacy and confidentiality. Conclusions: Patients and family members in rare disease social media groups appear interested in engaging with genetic counselors through social media, particularly for individualized support. This form of engagement on social media is not meant to replace the current structure and content of genetic counseling (GC) services, but genetic counselors could more actively use social media as a communication tool to address gaps in knowledge and awareness about genetics services and gaps in accessible patient information. Although encouraging, concerns regarding privacy and feasibility require further consideration, pointing to the need for professional guidelines in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The Global State of the Genetic Counseling Profession [J].
Abacan, MaryAnn ;
Alsubaie, Lamia ;
Barlow-Stewart, Kristine ;
Caanen, Beppy ;
Cordier, Christophe ;
Courtney, Eliza ;
Davoine, Emeline ;
Edwards, Janice ;
Elackatt, Niby J. ;
Gardiner, Kate ;
Guan, Yue ;
Huang, Lian-Hua ;
Malmgren, Charlotta Ingvoldstad ;
Kejriwal, Sahil ;
Kim, Hyon J. ;
Lambert, Deborah ;
Lantigua-Cruz, Paulina Araceli ;
Lee, Juliana M. H. ;
Lodahl, Marianne ;
Lunde, Ashild ;
Macaulay, Shelley ;
Macciocca, Ivan ;
Margarit, Sonia ;
Middleton, Anna ;
Moldovan, Ramona ;
Ngeow, Joanne ;
Obregon-Tito, Alexandra J. ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Paneque, Milena ;
Powell, Karen ;
Sanghavi, Kunal ;
Scotcher, Diana ;
Scott, Jenna ;
Juhe, Clara Serra ;
Shkedi-Rafid, Shiri ;
Wessels, Tina-Marie ;
Yoon, Sook-Yee ;
Wicklund, Catherine .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (02) :183-197
[2]  
Adam MP, 1993, GeneReviews
[3]   Scaling Genetic Counseling in the Genomics Era [J].
Amendola, Laura M. ;
Golden-Grant, Katie ;
Scollon, Sarah .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, VOL 22, 2021, 2021, 22 :339-355
[4]  
[Anonymous], R PROJECT STAT COMPU
[5]   Future of Rare Diseases Research 2017-2027: An IRDiRC Perspective [J].
Austin, Christopher P. ;
Cutillo, Christine M. ;
Lau, Lilian P. L. ;
Jonker, Anneliene H. ;
Rath, Ana ;
Julkowska, Daria ;
Thomson, David ;
Terry, Sharon F. ;
de Montleau, Beatrice ;
Ardigo, Diego ;
Hivert, Virginie ;
Boycott, Kym M. ;
Baynam, Gareth ;
Kaufmann, Petra ;
Taruscio, Domenica ;
Lochmuller, Hanns ;
Suematsu, Makoto ;
Incerti, Carlo ;
Draghia-Akli, Ruxandra ;
Norstedt, Irene ;
Wang, Lu ;
Dawkins, Hugh J. S. .
CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 11 (01) :21-27
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), GENET COUNSEL
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), GENET TEST
[8]  
Davenport Thomas, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P94, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
[9]   "Doctors can read about it, they can know about it, but they've never lived with it": How parents use social media throughout the diagnostic odyssey [J].
Deuitch, Natalie T. ;
Beckman, Erika ;
Halley, Meghan C. ;
Young, Jennifer L. ;
Reuter, Chloe M. ;
Kohler, Jennefer ;
Bernstein, Jonathan A. ;
Wheeler, Matthew T. ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Tabor, Holly K. .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (06) :1707-1718
[10]   Practical Guidance: The Use of Social Media In Oncology Practice [J].
Dizon, Don S. ;
Graham, David ;
Thompson, Michael A. ;
Johnson, Lisa J. ;
Johnston, Claire ;
Fisch, Michael J. ;
Miller, Robert .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2012, 8 (05) :E114-E124