Modelling Farmers' Behaviour Toward Risk in a Large Scale Positive Mathematical Programming (PMP) Model

被引:8
作者
Arribas, Ivan [1 ,2 ]
Louhichi, Kamel [3 ]
Perni, Angel [3 ]
Vila, Jose [2 ,4 ]
Gomez-y-Paloma, Sergio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Econ Anal, Ivie, Avda Naranjos S-N Edificio Dept Orienta, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, ERICES, Avda Naranjos S-N Edificio Dept Orienta, Valencia 46022, Spain
[3] European Commiss, JRC, IPTS, Edificio Expo C Inca Garcilaso, Seville 41092, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Dept Econ Anal, Avda Naranjos S-N Edificio Dept Orienta, Valencia 46022, Spain
来源
ADVANCES IN APPLIED ECONOMIC RESEARCH | 2017年
关键词
Farmers' behaviour; Risk; Large scale Positive Mathematical Programming; Common Agricultural Policy; Farm Level Model; MEAN-VARIANCE APPROACH; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; DUALITY MODELS; UNCERTAINTY; AVERSION; CALIBRATION; ATTITUDES; CLIMATE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-48454-9_42
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Agricultural production is characterized for being a risky business due to weather variability, market instability, plant diseases as well as climate change and political economy uncertainty. The modelling of risk at farm level is not new, however, the inclusion of risk in Positive Mathematical Programming (PMP) models is particularly challenging. Most of the few existing PMP-risk approaches have been conducted at farm-type level and for a very limited and specific sample of farms. This implies that the modelling of risk and uncertainty at individual farm level and in a large scale system is still a challenging task. The aim of this paper is to formulate, estimate and test a robust methodology for explicitly modelling risk to be incorporated in an EU-wide individual farm model for Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) analysis, named IFM-CAP. Results show that there is a clear trade-off between the behavioural model (BM) and the behavioural risk model (BRM). Albeit the results show that both alternatives provide very close estimates, the latter increases three times the computation time required for estimation. Despite this, we are convinced that the modelling of risk is crucial to better understand farmer behaviour and to accurately evaluate the impacts of risk management related policies (i.e. insurance schemes).
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 643
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PORTFOLIO SELECTION
[2]   INCORPORATING RISK IN PRODUCTION ANALYSIS [J].
ANTLE, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 65 (05) :1099-1106
[3]   Agricultural risk management policies under climate uncertainty [J].
Anton, Jesus ;
Cattaneo, Andrea ;
Kimura, Shingo ;
Lankoski, Jussi .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06) :1726-1736
[4]  
Arata L, 2014, 2014 INT C AUG 26 29
[5]  
Blanco F.B, 2002, P INT C RISK UNC ENV, P500
[6]   Economic behavior under uncertainty: A joint analysis of risk preferences and technology [J].
Chavas, JP ;
Holt, MT .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1996, 78 (02) :329-335
[7]   Modelling farmer participation to a revenue insurance scheme by the means of the Positive Mathematical Programming [J].
Cortignani, Raffaele ;
Severini, Simone .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2012, 58 (07) :324-331
[8]   RISK-AVERSION AND PRICE RISK IN DUALITY MODELS OF PRODUCTION - A LINEAR MEAN-VARIANCE APPROACH [J].
COYLE, BT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 74 (04) :849-859
[9]   Risk aversion and yield uncertainty in duality models of production: A mean-variance approach [J].
Coyle, BT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 81 (03) :553-567
[10]   Emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture: The heterogeneity of abatement costs in France [J].
De Cara, S ;
Jayet, PA .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 27 (03) :281-303