How does voting equipment affect the racial gap in voided ballots?

被引:68
作者
Tomz, M
Van Houweling, RP
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Gerald R Ford Sch Publ Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3186092
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
An accumulating body of research suggests that African Americans cast invalid ballots at a higher rate than whites. Our analysis of a unique precinct-level dataset from South Carolina and Louisiana shows that the black-white gap in voided ballots depends crucially on the voting equipment people use. In areas with punch cards or optically scanned ballots, the black-white gap ranged from four to six percentage points. Lever and electronic machines, which prohibit overvoting and make undervoting more transparent and correctible, cut the discrepancy by a factor of ten. Judging from exit polls and opinion surveys, much of the remaining difference could be due to intentional undervoting, which African Americans profess to practice at a slightly higher rate than whites. In any case, the use of appropriate voting technologies can virtually eliminate the black-white disparity in invalid ballots.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 60
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Achen ChristopherH., 1995, CROSS LEVEL INFERENC
[2]  
Agresti A., 1992, STAT SCI, V7, P131, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011454
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, VOT WHAT IS WHAT COU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SOLUTION ECOLOGICAL
[5]  
Ansolabehere S., 1995, BIAS ECOLOGICAL REGR
[6]  
BRADY HE, 2001, COUNTING ALL VOTES P
[7]  
DEUFEL BJ, 2000, BUT THEY REALLY VOTE
[8]  
Fessenden Ford, 2001, NY TIMES 1112, pA17
[9]  
*GAO, 2001, STAT AN FACT AFF UNC
[10]   ECOLOGICAL REGRESSIONS AND BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS [J].
Goodman, Leo A. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1953, 18 (06) :663-664