Construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator - II. Assessment of discriminant validity and expert benchmarking

被引:62
作者
Fried, Marvin P.
Sadoughi, Babak
Weghorst, Suzanne J.
Zeltsan, Michael
Cuellar, Hernando
Uribe, Jose I.
Sasaki, Clarence T.
Ross, Douglas A.
Jacobs, Joseph B.
Lebowitz, Richard A.
Satava, Richard M.
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Human Interface Technol Lab, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Otolaryngol Sect, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] NYU Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archotol.133.4.350
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: To establish discriminant validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator (ES3) (Lockheed Martin, Akron, Ohio) between various health care provider experience levels and to define benchmarking criteria for skills assessment. Design: Prospective multi-institutional comparison study Setting: University-based tertiary care institution Participants: Ten expert otolaryngologists, 14 otolaryngology residents, and 10 medical students. Interventions: Subjects completed the ES3's virtual reality curriculum (10 novice mode, 10 intermediate mode, and 3 advanced mode trials). Performance scores were recorded on each trial. Performance differences were analyzed using analysis of variance for repeated measures (experience level as between-subjects factor). Main Outcome Measures: Simulator performance scores, accuracy, time to completion, and hazard disruption. Results: The novice mode accurately distinguished the 3 groups, particularly at the onset of training (mean scores: senior otolaryngologists, 66.0; residents, 42.7; students, 18.3; for the paired comparisons between groups I and 2 and groups I and 3, P = .04 and .03, respectively). Subjects were not distinguished beyond trial 5. The intermediate mode only discriminated students from other subjects (P = .008). The advanced mode did not show performance differences between groups. Scores on the novice mode predicted those on the intermediate mode, which predicted advanced mode scores (r = 0.687), but no relationship was found between novice and advanced scores. All groups performed equally well and with comparable consistency at the outset of training. Expert scores were used to define benchmark criteria of optimal performance. Conclusions: This study completes the construct validity assessment of the ES3 by demonstrating its discriminant capabilities. It establishes expert surgeon benchmark performance criteria and shows that the ES3 can train novice subjects to attain those. The refined analysis of trial performance scores could serve educational and skills assessment purposes. Current studies are evaluating the transfer of surgical skills acquired on the ES3 to the operating room (predictive validity).
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 357
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Allison P., 2002, MISSING DATA
[2]   Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model [J].
Anastakis, DJ ;
Regehr, G ;
Reznick, RK ;
Cusimano, M ;
Murnaghan, J ;
Brown, M ;
Hutchison, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (02) :167-170
[3]   Assessment of construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator [J].
Arora, H ;
Uribe, J ;
Ralph, W ;
Zeltsan, M ;
Cuellar, H ;
Gallagher, A ;
Fried, MP .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2005, 131 (03) :217-221
[4]  
Chaudhry A, 1999, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V81, P281
[5]  
Edmonds E, 1997, Accid Emerg Nurs, V5, P8, DOI 10.1016/S0965-2302(97)90055-2
[6]  
Gallagher AG, 1999, ENDOSCOPY, V31, P310
[7]   Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance [J].
Gallagher, AG ;
Lederman, AB ;
McGlade, K ;
Satava, RM ;
Smith, CD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (04) :660-665
[8]   Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training [J].
Gallagher, AG ;
Ritter, EM ;
Satava, RM .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (10) :1525-1529
[9]  
Little R., 1987, STAT ANAL MISSING DA
[10]   Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: Predictive and concurrent validity [J].
Macmillan, AIM ;
Cuschieri, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :274-277