CHEMICAL CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT GOOSEGRASS

被引:5
|
作者
Takano, H. K. [1 ]
Oliveira, R. S., Jr. [2 ]
Constantin, J. [2 ]
Silva, V. F. V. [2 ]
Mendes, R. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Eleusine indica; residual herbicides; ACCase inhibithors; contact herbicides; application stage; ELEUSINE-INDICA; WEED MANAGEMENT; HERBICIDES; CROPS; GRASS; MALAYSIA; TURF;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582018360100055
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The use of mixtures and rotation of herbicide modes of action are essential for herbicide resistance management. The purpose of this research was to evaluate different pm- and post-emergence herbicides to control gooscgrass in soybean and corn. Four greenhouse experiments were conducted, one in preemergence and the three others in post-emergence. In pm-emergence, the number of emerged plants and the control percentage at 20, 35 and 50 days after application were evaluated. In post-emergence, the control percentage was evaluated at 14 and 28 days after application on plants with one tiller and four tillers. The use of residual herbicides to control glyphosate-resistant goosegrass is a very important tool for its effective management. The application stage is also crucial for post-emergence efficacy. Paraquat and [paraquat + diuron] are effective in controlling this species. The application of ACCase inhibiting herbicides alone seems to be more effective than their associations with glyphosate, especially in plants with four tillers. HPPD inhibiting herbicides have high synergism with atrazine and not with glyphosate.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] History and Outlook for Glyphosate-Resistant Crops
    Green, Jerry M.
    Siehl, Daniel L.
    REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 255: GLYPHOSATE, 2021, 255 : 67 - 91
  • [22] Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Control in Dicamba-Tolerant Soybean
    Vink, Joseph P.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Tardif, Francois J.
    Lawton, Mark B.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (03) : 422 - 428
  • [23] Influence of Dicamba and Dicamba plus Glyphosate Combinations on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis)
    Spaunhorst, Douglas J.
    Bradley, Kevin W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) : 675 - 681
  • [24] Impact of glyphosate-resistant sugar beet
    Morishita, Don W.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (05) : 1050 - 1053
  • [25] Herbicide Programs for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Volunteer Corn in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean
    Chahal, Parminder S.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 431 - 443
  • [26] Response of Glyphosate-resistant and Conventional Soybean Grafted Plants to Glyphosate
    Chen, Yin
    Jiang, Linjian
    Doohan, Douglas
    WEED SCIENCE, 2018, 66 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [27] Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with tiafenacil mixes in corn
    Soltani, Nader
    Shropshire, Christy
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (06) : 908 - 911
  • [28] Glyphosate Tolerance in Enhanced Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
    Huff, Jonathan A.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    Irby, J. Trenton
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 289 - 294
  • [29] Confirmation and Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in Nebraska
    Sarangi, Debalin
    Sandell, Lowell D.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Aulakh, Jatinder S.
    Lindquist, John L.
    Irmak, Suat
    Jhala, Amit J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) : 82 - 92
  • [30] Germination test as a fast method to detect glyphosate-resistant sourgrass
    Neves Dias, Marcos Altomani
    Botelhos Obara, Flavio Eduardo
    Arruda, Natalia
    Cursi, Patricia Ribeiro
    Goncalves, Navara Roberto
    Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
    BRAGANTIA, 2015, 74 (03) : 307 - 310