Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: A prospective clinical and radiographic study

被引:41
|
作者
Villarinho, Eduardo Aydos [1 ]
Triches, Diego Fernandes [1 ]
Alonso, Fernando Rizzo [1 ]
Mendonca Mezzomo, Luis Andre [2 ]
Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim [1 ]
Arai Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontifical Catholic Univ Rio Grande do Sul PUCRS, Sch Dent, Ave Ipiranga 6681,Predio 6, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Sch Dent, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
crown-to-implant ratio; dental implants; peri-implant bone loss; prospective clinical study; prosthetic complications; short implants; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE LOSS; LESS-THAN-10; MM; SURVIVAL; RATES; RATIO; COMPLICATIONS; RESTORATIONS; METAANALYSIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12494
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of short implants is still not a consensus for challenging clinical situations, such as unfavorable crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. PurposeThis prospective study evaluated the rates of prosthetic complications and implant failure, the mean marginal bone loss of 6-mm dental implants with single crowns in posterior regions and the potential risk factors. Materials and MethodsForty-six dental implants, 6-mm long and 4.1-mm wide, were placed in the posterior region in 20 patients. Patients were clinically and radiographically examined after the restoration with single crowns and on a yearly basis. Potential risk factors (arch, bruxism, maximum bite force, anatomical and clinical C/I ratios, and occlusal table area) were analyzed according to the following outcomes: implant survival, bone loss, and prosthetic complications. ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 459 (16-57) months. There was no early loss of implants. After prosthetic loading, 4 implants were lost (2 in the mandible and 2 in the maxilla; 91.3% survival), and there were 13 prosthetic complications (28.3%), yielding a 65.2% success rate. The frailty term showed a 95% greater chance of loss in the mandible than the maxilla. Mean peri-implant bone loss was of 0.2 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.4 mm in the first, second, third, and fourth years, respectively, with a mean cumulative loss of 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm at 48 months. In the multilevel model, the effects of the clinical C/I ratio and time were significant for bone loss (P<.001). It was estimated that a mean bone loss of 0.1 mm is associated with both a one-unit increase in time (12 months) and a 0.1 increase in the clinical C/I ratio. The other potential risk factors showed no significant relationship with the outcomes. ConclusionsThe 6-mm implants supporting single crowns performed well, but the mandible shows a higher risk of failure. The time and clinical C/I ratio are predictors for bone loss.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF SHORT LOCKING-TAPER IMPLANTS SUPPORTING SINGLE CROWNS IN THE POSTERIOR REGION: A 12-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Liao, Yilin
    Wu, Xinyu
    Zhao, Yaoyu
    Yan, Qi
    Shi, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 43 : S181 - S194
  • [22] Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study
    Rossi, Fabio
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Ricci, Emanuele
    Ferraioli, Lorenzo
    Baldi, Niccolo
    Botticelli, Daniele
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (12) : 1212 - 1219
  • [23] Comparison of Stress and Strain Distribution Around Splinted and Nonsplinted 6-mm Short Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Finite Element Analysis Study
    Meimandi, Mansour
    Ardakani, Mohammad Reza Talebi
    Amid, Reza
    Motlagh, Amir Mahmoudi
    Beheshti, Shahrzad
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [24] A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading
    Ayna, Mustafa
    Wessing, Bastian
    Gutwald, Ralf
    Neff, Andreas
    Ziebart, Thomas
    Acil, Yahya
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Guelses, Aydin
    ODONTOLOGY, 2019, 107 (02) : 244 - 253
  • [25] Clinical, Esthetic, and Radiographic Evaluation of Small-Diameter (3.0-mm) Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Anterior Region: A 3-Year Prospective Study
    Pieri, Francesco
    Siroli, Lucia
    Forlivesi, Caterina
    Corinaldesi, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 34 (06) : 825 - 832
  • [26] Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Single Crowns or Short Fixed Partial Dentures Supported by Short (≤6 mm) Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
    Hashemi, Sara
    Tabatabaei, Shivasadat
    Baghaei, Kimia
    Fathi, Amirhossein
    Atash, Ramin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 18 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [27] Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jun-Yu Shi
    Ying-Xin Gu
    Shi-Chong Qiao
    Long-Fei Zhuang
    Xiao-Meng Zhang
    Hong-Chang Lai
    Trials, 16
  • [28] Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Nielsen, Helle Baungaard
    Schou, Soren
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [29] Clinical Assessment of Short (> 6 mm and ≤ 8.5 mm) Implants in Posterior Sites with an Average Follow-Up of 74 Months: A Retrospective Study
    de Oliveira Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis
    Neves Ferreira, Newton da Rocha
    Heboyan, Artak
    Nassani, Leonardo Mohamad
    Afonso Pereira, Rafael Martins
    Hasse Fernandes, Juliana Campos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (05) : 915 - +
  • [30] Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sahrmann, P.
    Naenni, N.
    Jung, R. E.
    Hammerle, C. H. F.
    Attin, T.
    Schmidlin, P. R.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 102 (09) : 1015 - 1021