Multiple-response Bayesian calibration of watershed water quality models with significant input and model structure errors

被引:28
作者
Han, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Yi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Water Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water quality modeling; Non-point source pollution; Bayesian inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Multiple-response calibration; Uncertainty analysis; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; SIMULATION; INFERENCE; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.12.007
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
While watershed water quality (WWQ) models have been widely used to support water quality management, their profound modeling uncertainty remains an unaddressed issue. Data assimilation via Bayesian calibration is a promising solution to the uncertainty, but has been rarely practiced for WWQ modeling. This study applied multiple-response Bayesian calibration (MRBC) to SWAT, a classic WWQ model, using the nitrate pollution in the Newport Bay Watershed (southern California, USA) as the study case. How typical input and model structure errors would impact modeling uncertainty, parameter identification and management decision-making was systematically investigated through both synthetic and real-situation modeling cases. The main study findings include: (1) with an efficient sampling scheme, MRBC is applicable to WWQ modeling in characterizing its parametric and predictive uncertainties; (2) incorporating hydrology responses, which are less susceptible to input and model structure errors than water quality responses, can improve the Bayesian calibration results and benefit potential modeling-based management decisions; and (3) the value of MRBC to modeling-based decision-making essentially depends on pollution severity, management objective and decision maker's risk tolerance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 123
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]   An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models [J].
Campolongo, Francesca ;
Cariboni, Jessica ;
Saltelli, Andrea .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (10) :1509-1518
[12]   Decision support system for stakeholder involvement [J].
Chen, CW ;
Herr, J ;
Weintraub, L .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (06) :714-721
[13]  
Chow GC, 1981, J ECON, P16
[14]   OPTIMAL USE OF THE SCE-UA GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR CALIBRATING WATERSHED MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, VK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1994, 158 (3-4) :265-284
[15]   Pitfalls and improvements in the joint inference of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation in hydrological model calibration [J].
Evin, Guillaume ;
Kavetski, Dmitri ;
Thyer, Mark ;
Kuczera, George .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (07) :4518-4524
[16]   Integrated hydrological and water quality model for river management: A case study on Lena River [J].
Fonseca, Andre ;
Botelho, Cidalia ;
Boaventura, Rui A. R. ;
Vilar, Vitor J. P. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 485 :474-489
[17]  
Gardner KK, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, P47
[18]  
Gelman A., 1992, Statistical Science, V7, P457, DOI [DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011136, 10.1214/ss/1177011136]
[19]  
Hantush MM, 2014, J HYDROL ENG, V19
[20]   Integrated uncertainty assessment of discharge predictions with a statistical error model [J].
Honti, M. ;
Stamm, C. ;
Reichert, P. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (08) :4866-4884