Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis

被引:105
|
作者
Chilcott, J
McCabe, C [1 ]
Tappenden, P
O'Hagan, A
Cooper, NJ
Abrams, K
Claxton, K
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res Rapid Rev Grp, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Probabil & Stat, Ctr Bayesian Stat Hlth Econ, Sheffield S3 7RH, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Leicester LE1 6TP, Leics, England
[4] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2003年 / 326卷 / 7388期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.326.7388.522
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness of four disease modifying treatments (interferon betas and glatiramer acetate) for relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom. Design Modelling cost effectiveness. Setting UK NHS. Participants Patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Main outcome measures Cost per quality adjusted life year gained. Results The base case cost per quality adjusted life year gained by using any of the four treatments ranged from pound42 000 ($66 469; (sic) 61 630) to pound98 000 based on efficacy information in the public domain. Uncertainty analysis suggests that the probability of any of these therapies having a cost effectiveness better than pound20 000 is below 20%. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were the time horizon, the progression of patients after stopping treatment, differential discount rates, and the price of the treatments. Conclusions Cost effectiveness varied markedly between the interventions. Uncertainty around point estimates was substantial. This uncertainty could be reduced by conducting research on the true magnitude of the effect of these drugs, the progression of patients after stopping treatment, the costs of care, and the quality of life of the patients. Price was the key modifiable determinant of the cost effectiveness of these treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 525
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis (vol 326, pg 522, 2003)
    Chilcott, J.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7595): : 685 - 685
  • [2] The Use of Interferon Beta and Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple Sclerosis
    Goodin, Douglas S.
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2013, 33 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [3] Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation`
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    Auguste, Peter
    Armoiry, Xavier
    Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy
    Court, Rachel
    Madan, Jason
    Kan, Alan
    Lin, Stephanie
    Counsell, Carl
    Patterson, Jacoby
    Rodrigues, Jeremy
    Ciccarelli, Olga
    Fraser, Hannah
    Clarke, Aileen
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 21 (52) : I - +
  • [4] Comparative effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and interferon beta formulations in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Kalincik, Tomas
    Jokubaitis, Vilija
    Izquierdo, Guillermo
    Duquette, Pierre
    Girard, Marc
    Grammond, Pierre
    Lugaresi, Alessandra
    Oreja-Guevara, Celia
    Bergamaschi, Roberto
    Hupperts, Raymond
    Grand'Maison, Francois
    Pucci, Eugenio
    Van Pesch, Vincent
    Boz, Cavit
    Iuliano, Gerardo
    Fernandez-Bolanos, Ricardo
    Flechter, Shlomo
    Spitaleri, Daniele
    Cristiano, Edgardo
    Verheul, Freek
    Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
    Amato, Maria Pia
    Antonio Cabrera-Gomez, Jose
    Saladino, Maria Laura
    Slee, Mark
    Moore, Fraser
    Gray, Orla
    Paine, Mark
    Barnett, Michael
    Havrdova, Eva
    Horakova, Dana
    Spelman, Timothy
    Trojano, Maria
    Butzkueven, Helmut
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (09) : 1159 - 1171
  • [6] Combination therapy with interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis
    Ytterberg, C.
    Johansson, S.
    Anderson, M.
    Olsson, D.
    Link, H.
    Holmqvist, L. W.
    von Koch, L.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 116 (02): : 96 - 99
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF GLATIRAMER ACETATE AND INTERFERON BETA-1A FOR RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, BASED ON THE COMBIRX STUDY
    Darba, J.
    Kaskens, L.
    Sanchez-de la Rosa, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A623 - A623
  • [8] Comparison of Switch to Fingolimod or Interferon Beta/Glatiramer Acetate in Active Multiple Sclerosis
    He, Anna
    Spelman, Tim
    Jokubaitis, Vilija
    Havrdova, Eva
    Horakova, Dana
    Trojano, Maria
    Lugaresi, Alessandra
    Izquierdo, Guillermo
    Grammond, Pierre
    Duquette, Pierre
    Girard, Marc
    Pucci, Eugenio
    Iuliano, Gerardo
    Alroughani, Raed
    Oreja-Guevara, Celia
    Fernandez-Bolanos, Ricardo
    Grand'Maison, Francois
    Sola, Patrizia
    Spitaleri, Daniele
    Granella, Franco
    Terzi, Murat
    Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
    Van Pesch, Vincent
    Hupperts, Raymond
    Luis Sanchez-Menoyo, Jose
    Hodgkinson, Suzanne
    Rozsa, Csilla
    Verheul, Freek
    Butzkueven, Helmut
    Kalincik, Tomas
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2015, 72 (04) : 405 - 413
  • [9] A comparison of the mechanisms of action of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis
    Zhang, JW
    Hutton, G
    Zang, Y
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (12) : 1998 - 2021
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate in newly diagnosed non-primary progressive multiple sclerosis
    Prosser, LA
    Kuntz, KM
    Bar-Or, A
    Weinstein, MC
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (05) : 554 - 568