Uncertainty and crude oil market volatility: new evidence

被引:127
作者
Liang, Chao [1 ]
Wei, Yu [2 ]
Li, Xiafei [1 ]
Zhang, Xuhui [3 ]
Zhang, Yifeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, 237 Longquan Rd, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Panzhihua, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty indices; oil price volatility; elastic net; Lasso; combination forecast; EQUITY PREMIUM PREDICTION; PRICE VOLATILITY; FORECAST COMBINATIONS; SELECTION; RETURNS; SAMPLE; PREDICTABILITY; SHRINKAGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2019.1696943
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The main goal of this paper is to investigate the predictability of five economic uncertainty indices for oil price volatility in a changing world. We employ the standard predictive regression framework, several model combination approaches, as well as two prevailing model shrinkage methods to evaluate the performances of the uncertainty indices. The empirical results based on simple autoregression models including only one index suggest that global economic policy uncertainty (GEPU) and US equity market volatility (EMV) indices have significant predictive power for crude oil market volatility. In addition, the model combination approaches adopted in this paper can improve slightly the performances of individual autoregressive models. Lastly, the two model shrinkage methods, namely Elastin net and Lasso, outperform other individual AR-type model and combination models in most forecasting cases. Other empirical results based on alternative forecasting methods, estimation window sizes, high/low volatility and economic expansion/recession time periods further make sure the robustness of our major conclusions. The findings in this paper also have several important economic implications for oil investors.
引用
收藏
页码:2945 / 2959
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Uncertainty and crude oil returns
    Aloui, Riadh
    Gupta, Rangan
    Miller, Stephen M.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 55 : 92 - 100
  • [2] Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility
    Andersen, Torben G.
    Bollerslev, Tim
    Diebold, Francis X.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) : 701 - 720
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, BAGGING TIME SERIES
  • [4] Dynamic spillovers of oil price shocks and economic policy uncertainty
    Antonakakis, Nikolaos
    Chatziantoniou, Ioannis
    Filis, George
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 44 : 433 - 447
  • [5] Lassoing the HAR Model: A Model Selection Perspective on Realized Volatility Dynamics
    Audrino, Francesco
    Knaus, Simon D.
    [J]. ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2016, 35 (8-10) : 1485 - 1521
  • [6] Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty
    Baker, Scott R.
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Davis, Steven J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) : 1593 - 1636
  • [7] The role of news-based uncertainty indices in predicting oil markets: a hybrid nonparametric quantile causality method
    Balcilar, Mehmet
    Bekiros, Stelios
    Gupta, Rangan
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 53 (03) : 879 - 889
  • [8] Measures of global uncertainty and carry-trade excess returns
    Berg, Kimberly A.
    Mark, Nelson C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2018, 88 : 212 - 227
  • [9] Caldara Dario., 2018, Measuring Geopolitical Risk
  • [10] Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average?
    Campbell, John Y.
    Thompson, Samuel B.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (04) : 1509 - 1531