Supine and Standing AP Pelvis Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement

被引:41
作者
Jackson, Timothy J. [1 ]
Estess, Allyson A. [1 ]
Adamson, Gregory J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Congress Orthoped Associates, 800 South Raymond Ave, Pasadena, CA 91105 USA
关键词
HIP; PARAMETERS; TILT;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-016-4766-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Pelvic tilt can affect the presence of the ischial spine sign and crossover sign. Numerous studies of pelvic tilt on radiographic measurements of pincer impingement have shown that increasing anterior tilt is associated with more radiographic signs of pincer impingement. However, to our knowledge, no study has directly compared supine and standing plain radiographs in patients with respect to lateral center-edge (LCE) angle, acetabular inclination, crossover sign, and ischial spine sign. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in supine and standing AP pelvis radiographs as they relate to the radiographic parameters of pincer impingement in an adult population evaluated for femoroacetabular impingement, specifically intrapelvic distances (sacrococcygeal to symphysis [SC-S] and coccyx tip to symphysis [T-S]), crossover sign (presence and percentage), LCE angle, inclination, and ischial spine sign. Between August 2013 and June 2014, we obtained supine and standing radiographs for all new patients younger than 60 years who were evaluated for hip pain, when the diagnosis of fracture was not being considered; these formed the basis of this retrospective study. Patients were excluded if they had arthritis (Tonnis grade a parts per thousand yen 2), lumbar fusion, previous hip surgery, or malrotated films. Forty-six hips, symptomatic side, met the inclusion criteria (age of patients, 33 +/- 14 years; 13 males, 33 females). Radiographic data that were collected included SC-S distance, T-S distance, LCE angle, acetabular inclination, presence and percentage of crossover sign, and presence of ischial spine sign. A paired t-test was used to compare continuous variables and chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Two independent readers performed measurements. From supine to standing films, the T-S distance decreased from 19 +/- 18 mm to 6 +/- 19 mm (p < 0.001), and SC-S distance decreased from 47 +/- 19 mm to 32 +/- 20 mm (p < 0.001), indicating less pelvic tilt in the standing position. The number of hips that had crossover signs decreased from supine (n = 18, 39%) to standing (n = 9, 20%) (p = 0.039). The amount of crossover decreased from 23% +/- 10% to 11% +/- 13% (p < 0.001). LCE angle did not change (27A degrees +/- 7A degrees to 27A degrees +/- 8A degrees) (p = 0.64) and inclination angle increased by a small amount (4.2A degrees +/- 5A degrees to 5.3A degrees +/- 5A degrees) (p = 0.002). The ischial spine sign decreased from supine (n = 20, 43%) to standing (n = 7, 15%) position (p = 0.003). There is a decrease in the amount of pelvic tilt on standing AP pelvis radiographs resulting in a decrease in the incidence and amount of crossover sign and ischial spine sign, and a small increase in inclination. Standing radiographs should be the standard in evaluation of nonarthritic hip pain, specifically pincer femoroacetabular impingement. Surgeons should use caution in interpreting supine AP radiographs in the evaluation of pincer impingement, specifically the crossover sign. Level III, diagnostic study.
引用
收藏
页码:1692 / 1696
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can modified Dunn radiographs be an alternative to standing AP pelvis radiographs in the evaluation of pincer femoroacetabular impingement?
    Cici, Hakan
    Zeybek, Hakan
    Hapa, Onur
    JOURNAL OF HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY, 2023, 10 (01): : 3 - 7
  • [2] Functional Acetabular Orientation Varies Between Supine and Standing Radiographs: Implications for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement
    Ross, James R.
    Tannenbaum, Eric P.
    Nepple, Jeffrey J.
    Kelly, Bryan T.
    Larson, Christopher M.
    Bedi, Asheesh
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (04) : 1267 - 1273
  • [3] Femoroacetabular pincer impingement
    Herzog, R. F.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2014, 27 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [4] Femoroacetabular pincer impingement
    Herzog R.F.
    Arthroskopie, 2014, 27 (2) : 109 - 117
  • [5] Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular pincer impingement
    Poh, S. -Y.
    Hube, R.
    Dienst, M. M. D.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2015, 27 (06): : 536 - 552
  • [6] The diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement can be made on pelvis radiographs using deep learning methods
    Atalar, Ebru
    Ureten, Kemal
    Kanatli, Ulunay
    Ciceklidag, Murat
    Kaya, Ibrahim
    Vural, Abdurrahman
    Maras, Yuksel
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 34 (02) : 298 - 304
  • [7] Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement
    Larson, Christopher M.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 20 (04) : 273 - 280
  • [8] Supine Versus Standing Radiographs for Detecting Ischiofemoral Impingement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Park, Sunghoon
    Lee, Hyun Young
    Cuong, Pham Manh
    Won, Ye-Yeon
    Ji, Hyung-Min
    Yoon, Seung-Hyun
    Kwack, Kyu-Sung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (06) : 1253 - 1263
  • [9] Cam and Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement: CT Findings of Features Resembling Femoroacetabular Impingement in a Young Population Without Symptoms
    Chakraverty, Julian K.
    Sullivan, Carl
    Gan, Chee
    Narayanaswamy, Srikanth
    Kamath, Sridhar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (02) : 389 - 395
  • [10] The plain β-angle measured on radiographs in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement
    Brunner, A.
    Hamers, A. T.
    Fitze, M.
    Herzog, R. F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (09): : 1203 - 1208