Seismic response of civil structures utilizing semi-active MR and ER bracing systems

被引:18
作者
Hiemenz, GJ [1 ]
Wereley, NM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Aerosp Engn, Smart Struct Lab, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1106/TTXP-20DM-G861-HU0M
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Magnetorheological (MR) and electrorheological (ER) dampers are a promising class of semi-active devices for the control of civil engineering structures for earthquake hazard mitigation. ER and MR dampers exhibit both viscous damping and Friction damping, where the friction damping level is controlled by an applied electric or magnetic field, respectively. These unique characteristics lend them to be very suitable devices for the semi-active control of such seismically loaded structures. Inspection of the equation of motion for such a system yields a non-dimensional variable, beta, which is the ratio of the yield force of the damper to the forcing input (the product of a characteristic mass of the building and the seismic acceleration). It is shown that maintaining beta < 1 prevents a damper lockup condition that will stiffen the structure. This stiffening may cause the structural response spectrum to coalesce with the earthquake spectrum, and worsen the seismic response. beta is also useful because it can be used to scale a damper to a structure for a desired response reduction, and it can be used as a non-dimensional control parameter. It is also shown that for lightly viscous damped structures (like most civil structures), the response reduction is approximately linear with beta. Numerical analyses are performed on a three-story model structure for different damper locations. It is shown that placing dampers near the base of the structure, as opposed to the upper levels, yields better frequency response reduction. Lastly, it is shown that passively controlling structures undergoing seismic accelerations with constant field applied to the damper greatly reduces the seismic response.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 651
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability assessment of semi-active control of structures with MR damper
    Hadidi, Ali
    Azar, Bahman Farahmand
    Shirgir, Sina
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 17 (02) : 131 - 141
  • [42] Protection of seismic structures using semi-active friction TMD
    Lin, Chi-Chang
    Lin, Ging-Long
    Wang, Jer-Fu
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2010, 39 (06) : 635 - 659
  • [43] A comparative study of active and semi-active control of building seismic response
    Popescu, I.
    Sireteanu, T.
    Mitu, A. M.
    BSG PROCEEDINGS 17, 2010, 17 : 172 - 177
  • [44] A comparative study of active and semi-active control of building seismic response
    Popescu, I.
    Sireteanu, T.
    Mitu, A. M.
    BSG PROCEEDINGS 17 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS (DGDS-2009), 2010, : 172 - 177
  • [45] Study on the seismic response control of single pile platform with seismic isolation structure by using the semi-active MR damper
    Sun, S.
    Liang, Q.
    Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2001, 20 (03) : 61 - 64
  • [46] A new high performance semi-active bracing system
    Golafshani, Ali Akbar
    Rahani, Ehsan Kabiri
    Tabeshpour, Mohammad Reza
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (14) : 1972 - 1982
  • [47] Response prediction methods for semi-active control of structures
    Serino, G
    Georgakis, CT
    STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 109 - 114
  • [48] A semi-active stiffness damper for vibration control of civil engineering structures
    Yang, JN
    Agrawal, AK
    Kim, JH
    IMAC - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE, VOLS I AND II, 1999, 3727 : 437 - 443
  • [49] A new semi-active control device for seismic response reduction
    Dyke, SJ
    Spencer, BF
    Sain, MK
    Carlson, JD
    ENGINEERING MECHANICS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 886 - 889
  • [50] Vibration control of a passenger vehicle utilizing a semi-active ER engine mount
    Choi, SB
    Song, HJ
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2002, 37 (03) : 193 - 216