Anterior drawer test for acute anterior talofibular ligament injuries of the ankle - How much load should be applied during the test?

被引:43
作者
Tohyama, H
Yasuda, K
Ohkoshi, Y
Beynnon, BD
Renstrom, PA
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Sch Med, Dept Adv Surg, Div Med Bioengn & Sports Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan
[2] Hakodate Cent Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Surg Sci, Sect Sports Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1177/03635465030310021201
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the magnitude of load for performing the anterior drawer test in evaluating acute ankle injuries. Purpose: To determine how much load should be applied during the anterior drawer test to detect the integrity of the anterior talofibular ligament. Methods: First, the anterior-posterior load-displacement response of nine cadaveric ankles was measured. Second, anterior displacement of the ankle was measured at 30 and 60 N of anterior load in 14 patients with acute tears of the anterior talofibular ligament. Results: In the cadaver study, the increased displacement by sectioning of the ligament measured at 10, 20, 30, and 40 N of anterior load were significantly greater than those measured at 60 N. In vivo examination of the subjects without anesthesia demonstrated that the injured-to-normal displacement value at 30 N of anterior load was significantly greater than the value at 60 N. Conclusions: This study suggests that a large magnitude of anterior load is not necessary to detect the integrity of the ligament during the anterior drawer test. Clinical Relevance: When evaluating the integrity of the anterior talofibular ligament in cases of acute ankle ligament injury, a relatively low-magnitude load should be applied. (C) 2003 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 232
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Becker H P, 1993, Foot Ankle, V14, P459
[2]   TREATMENT FOR PARTIAL TEARS OF THE LATERAL LIGAMENT OF THE ANKLE - A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL [J].
BROOKS, SC ;
POTTER, BT ;
RAINEY, JB .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 282 (6264) :606-607
[3]  
BROSTROEM L, 1964, Acta Chir Scand, V128, P483
[4]  
DREZ DJ, 1989, J MUSCULOSKEL MED, V6, P21
[5]   The manual stress test may not be sufficient to differentiate ankle ligament injuries [J].
Fujii, T ;
Luo, ZP ;
Kitaoka, HB ;
An, KN .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (08) :619-623
[6]   INSTABILITY OF THE ANKLE AFTER INJURY TO THE LATERAL LIGAMENT [J].
GLASGOW, M ;
JACKSON, A ;
JAMIESON, AM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1980, 62 (02) :196-200
[7]   THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT TO ANKLE LAXITY [J].
JOHNSON, EE ;
MARKOLF, KL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 65 (01) :81-88
[8]   TREATMENT FOR ACUTE TEARS OF THE LATERAL LIGAMENTS OF THE ANKLE - OPERATION, CAST, OR EARLY CONTROLLED MOBILIZATION [J].
KANNUS, P ;
RENSTROM, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (02) :305-312
[9]  
LAHDE S, 1988, EUR J RADIOL, V8, P255
[10]   Changes in the flexibility characteristics of the ankle complex due to damage to the lateral collateral ligaments: An in vitro and in vivo study [J].
Lapointe, SJ ;
Siegler, S ;
Hillstrom, H ;
Nobilini, RR ;
Mlodzienski, A ;
Techner, L .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (03) :331-341