Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews

被引:14
作者
Diez-Fernandez, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dolores Rodriguez-Huerta, Maria [4 ]
Miron-Gonzalez, Ruben [5 ]
Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, Jose [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Maria Martin-Espinosa, Noelia [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ctr Estudios Sociosanitarios, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Enfermeria Cuenca, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[3] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Enfermeria Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac, Campus Univ S-N, Albacete 02071, Spain
[4] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Madrid 28006, Spain
[5] Univ Alcala, Dept Nursing & Physiotherapy, Community Care & Social Determinants Hlth Res Grp, Alcala De Henares 28805, Spain
[6] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Grp Invest Multidisciplinar Cuidados IMCU, Campus Fabr Armas,Av Carlos III 21, Toledo 45071, Spain
[7] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Fisioterapia & Enfermeria, Campus Fabr Armas,Av Carlos III 21, Toledo 45071, Spain
关键词
flash glucose monitoring; quality of life; patients’ satisfaction; diabetes mellitus; meta-review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TYPE-2 DIABETES PATIENTS; SENSING TECHNOLOGY; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MULTICENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18063123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have been suggested to have clinical beneficial effects in patients with diabetes mellitus, although their improvements in terms of quality of life (QoL) and patients' satisfaction are not always addressed or are considered a secondary outcome. Thus, the aim of this meta-review is to establish the benefits of FGM in terms of patients' satisfaction and QoL in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients using evidence from past systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Major databases were searched for systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that assessed the satisfaction or QoL of type 1 or 2 diabetes patients using FGM compared with other glucose monitoring systems. The quality of the included systematic reviews was addressed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. Six systematic reviews (including two meta-analyses) were included in the meta-review. Evidence suggests that FGM systems seem to improve patients' satisfaction and QoL compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, although the high variability in the measurement tools, the clinical significance and the quality of the systematic reviews included do not allow us to state FGM benefits with any certainty. Further research, including high-quality randomised clinical trials, differentiating the needs of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients and focusing on psychosocial benefits for these patients is needed to optimise clinical decisions between patients and professionals by developing the right health technology assessment for FGM systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Reduction in HbA1c using professional flash glucose monitoring in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients managed in primary and secondary care settings: A pilot, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Ajjan, Ramzi A.
    Jackson, Neil
    Thomson, Scott A.
    [J]. DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH, 2019, 16 (04) : 385 - 395
  • [2] Acceptability of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System: The Experience of Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
    Al Hayek, Ayman A.
    Robert, Asirvatham A.
    Al Dawish, Mohamed A.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND DIABETES, 2020, 13
  • [3] The Potential Impact of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Mental Well-Being and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Study
    Al Hayek, Ayman A.
    Al Dawish, Mohamed A.
    [J]. DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (04) : 1239 - 1248
  • [4] Accuracy of a 14-Day Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System With Advanced Algorithm in Pediatric and Adult Population With Diabetes
    Alva, Shridhara
    Bailey, Timothy
    Brazg, Ronald
    Budiman, Erwin S.
    Castorino, Kristin
    Christiansen, Mark P.
    Forlenza, Gregory
    Kipnes, Mark
    Liljenquist, David R.
    Liu, Hanqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (01): : 70 - 77
  • [5] American Diabetes Association, 2017, Diabetes Care, V40, pS33
  • [6] Flash glucose monitoring (FGM): A clinical review on glycaemic outcomes and impact on quality of life
    Ang, Eshen
    Lee, Zong Xuan
    Moore, Sacha
    Nana, Melanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2020, 34 (06)
  • [7] Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial
    Bolinder, Jan
    Antuna, Ramiro
    Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, Petronella
    Kroeger, Jens
    Weitgasser, Raimund
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 388 (10057) : 2254 - 2263
  • [8] The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL
    Bradley, C
    Todd, C
    Gorton, T
    Symonds, E
    Martin, A
    Plowright, R
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (1-2) : 79 - 91
  • [9] Bradley C., 1994, Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes, P111
  • [10] Wearable Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: A Revolution in Diabetes Treatment
    Cappon, Giacomo
    Acciaroli, Giada
    Vettoretti, Martina
    Facchinetti, Andrea
    Sparacino, Giovanni
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2017, 6 (03):