Corporate cleaner production strategy development and environmental management accounting: A contingency theory perspective

被引:25
作者
Gunarathne, Nuwan [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ki-Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Cleaner production; Contingency theory; Corporate sustainability; Environmental management accounting; Sri Lanka; SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; EMA; COMPANIES; EVOLUTION; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127402
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the popularity of environmental management accounting as an approach to support corporate cleaner production measures, so far, how the environmental management accounting implementation differs according to the stage of cleaner production strategy development is largely unknown. This study thus sought to identify how the uses of environmental management accounting and information characteristics vary among organizations at different stages of cleaner production strategy development. Drawing on the contingency theory view of environmental management accounting system sophistication, cleaner production strategy development stages, and environmental management accounting uses, it developed an analytical framework. Based on eighteen case studies of business in Sri Lanka, the study analyzed the different domain-based and functional uses of environmental management accounting and their characteristics according to their cleaner production strategy development (i.e., reactive, preventive and proactive stages). Overall, the study found that environmental management accounting uses to be limited and fragmented in organizations at the reactive and preventive stages except for using environmental management accounting for cost savings and efficiency improvements. However, the findings suggest that as and when organizations progress into higher levels of cleaner production strategy development, there is a relatively high level of use of environmental management accounting in terms of integrative tools, and for control and stewardship purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV QUAL MANAG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, J ACCOUNT LIT
[3]  
Bartolomeo M., 2000, The European Accounting Review, V9, P31, DOI [DOI 10.1080/096381800407932, 10.1080/096381800407932]
[4]  
Bhimani A., 2011, MANAGEMENT COST ACCO
[5]  
Bouma J.J., 2002, Environmental Management Accounting: Informational and Institutional Developments, P279
[6]  
Burritt R., 2004, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V13, P13, DOI [10.1002/bse.379, DOI 10.1002/BSE.379]
[7]  
Burritt R.L., 2002, AUST ACCOUNT REV, V12, P39, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1835-2561.2002.TB00202.X
[8]   Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? [J].
Burritt, Roger L. ;
Schaltegger, Stefan .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2010, 23 (07) :829-846
[9]   Environmental management accounting for cleaner production: The case of a Philippine rice mill [J].
Burritt, Roger L. ;
Herzig, Christian ;
Tadeo, Bernardo D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (04) :431-439
[10]   Diffusion of environmental management accounting for cleaner production: Evidence from some case studies [J].
Burritt, Roger Leonard ;
Herzig, Christian ;
Schaltegger, Stefan ;
Viere, Tobias .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 224 :479-491