Proliferation of prenatal ultrasonography

被引:74
作者
You, John J. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Alter, David A. [5 ,6 ]
Stukel, Therese A. [5 ]
McDonald, Sarah D. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Laupacis, Andreas [5 ,6 ]
Liu, Ying [5 ]
Ray, Joel G. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[5] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS; SUBSEQUENT HANDEDNESS; OBSTETRIC ULTRASOUND; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; RISK; HEALTH; PROGRESS; CARE; TOO;
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.090979
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The extent to which temporal increases in the use of prenatal ultrasonography reflect changes in maternal risk is unknown. In this population-based study, we examined the use of prenatal ultrasonography from 1996 to 2006 in Ontario. Methods: With fiscal year 1996/97 as the baseline, we evaluated the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change in rates of ultrasonography for each subsequent year. The RR was adjusted for maternal ageb income, rural residence, maternal comorbidities, receipt of genetics consultation or amniocentesis - all in the index pregnancy - and history of complications in a prior pregnancy. Results: The study sample consisted of 1 399 389 singleton deliveries. The rate of prenatal ultrasonography increased from 2055 per 1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 3264 per 1000 in 2006 (adjusted RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.54-1.55). The rate increased among both women with low-risk pregnancies (adjusted RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.53-1.55) and those with high-risk pregnancies (adjusted RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.54-1.55). The proportion of pregnancies with at least four ultrasound examinations in the second or third trimesters rose from 6.4% in 1996 to 18.7% in 2006 (adjusted RR 2.68, 95% CI 2.61-2.74). Paradoxically, this increase was more pronounced among low-risk pregnancies (adjusted RR 2.92, 95% CI 2.83-3.01) than among high-risk pregnancies (adjusted RR 2.25, 95% CI 2.16-2.35). Interpretation: Substantial increases in the use of prenatal ultrasonography over the past decade do not appear to reflect changes in maternal risk. Nearly one in five women now undergo four or more ultrasound examinations during the second and third trimesters. efforts to promote more appropriate use of prenatal ultrasonography for singleton pregnancies appear warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 151
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
*ONT MIN HLTH LONG, 2009, ONT HLTH INS PLAN OH
[22]   Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study [J].
Ray, JG ;
Vermeulen, MJ ;
Schull, MJ ;
Redelmeier, DA .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9499) :1797-1803
[23]   Pay Now, Benefits May Follow - The Case of Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography [J].
Redberg, Rita F. ;
Walsh, Judith .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (22) :2309-2311
[24]   ROUTINE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN-UTERO AND SUBSEQUENT HANDEDNESS AND NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT [J].
SALVESEN, KA ;
VATTEN, LJ ;
EIKNES, SH ;
HUGDAHL, K ;
BAKKETEIG, LS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6897) :159-164
[25]   The Complexity of Fetal Imaging Reconciling Clinical Care With Patient Entertainment [J].
Simonsen, Sara Ellis ;
Branch, D. Ware ;
Rose, Nancy C. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (06) :1351-1354
[26]   Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment [J].
Studdert, DM ;
Mello, MM ;
Sage, WM ;
DesRoches, CM ;
Peugh, J ;
Zapert, K ;
Brennan, TA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (21) :2609-2617
[27]   Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy [J].
Summers, Anne M. ;
Langlois, Sylvie ;
Wyatt, Phil ;
Wilson, R. Douglas .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2007, 29 (02) :146-161
[28]  
Thompson E, 1998, CAN MED ASSOC J, V158, P307
[29]   Sensitivity and specificity of computerized algorithms to classify gestational periods in the absence of information on date of conception [J].
Toh, Sengwee ;
Mitchell, Allen A. ;
Werler, Martha M. ;
Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 167 (06) :633-640
[30]  
*US PREV SERV TASK, 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV, P407