Review: Anticipating alternative trajectories for responsible Agriculture 4.0 innovation in livestock systems

被引:32
作者
Eastwood, C. R. [1 ]
Edwards, J. P. [1 ]
Turner, J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, DairyNZ Ltd, Feed & Farm Syst Grp, POB 85066, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
[2] AgResearch, Ruakura Res Ctr, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand
关键词
Agriculture; 4.0; Animal welfare; Digital agriculture; Futures; Livestock; DAIRY FARMS; PRECISION; TECHNOLOGIES; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSITIONS; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.animal.2021.100296
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Technological change has been a constant feature of livestock systems leading to the third agricultural 'green' revolution of the mid-20th century. Digital technologies are now leading us into the fourth agricultural revolution, where sustainable food production is supported by technologies that collect data useful for farm and supply chain performance improvement, along with task automation and compliance. However, the potential benefits of digital agricultural futures are uncertain and plagued by unrealized expectations of previous innovations. The aims of this paper are to articulate current trends in technology and livestock systems and anticipate future trajectories for Agriculture 4.0 in relation to meeting sustainability and animal welfare outcomes for livestock systems. We use a 'Futures Triangle' approach to review the role of technology in livestock systems. The main findings are that previous work envisioning technological livestock futures have favoured pull of the future factors (techno-optimists) or weight of the past (techno-pessimists), rather than a balance of pull, push and weighting factors. Responsible Agriculture 4.0 innovation requires public-private collaboration of innovation system stakeholders, including policy makers, farmers, consumers, as well as technology developers, to enable development of transition pathways from a systems perspective. The use of responsible innovation processes, including anticipation on alternative futures, should also be built into innovation processes to support critical reflection on technological trajectories and related innovation system consequences, both desirable and undesirable. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENH AGR INN GO STREN
[2]   The role of interoperable data standards in precision livestock farming in extensive livestock systems: A review [J].
Bahlo, Christiane ;
Dahlhaus, Peter ;
Thompson, Helen ;
Trotter, Mark .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 156 :459-466
[3]   Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What's In, What's Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated? [J].
Barrett, Hannah ;
Rose, David Christian .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2022, 62 (02) :162-189
[4]   Evaluating one health: Are we demonstrating effectiveness? [J].
Baum, Sarah E. ;
Machalab, Catherine ;
Daszak, Peter ;
Salerno, Robert H. ;
Karesh, William B. .
ONE HEALTH, 2017, 3 :5-10
[5]   Invited review: Learning from the future-A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067 [J].
Britt, J. H. ;
Cushman, R. A. ;
Dechow, C. D. ;
Dobson, H. ;
Humblot, P. ;
Hutjens, M. F. ;
Jones, G. A. ;
Ruegg, P. S. ;
Sheldon, I. M. ;
Stevenson, J. S. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (05) :3722-3741
[6]   Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming [J].
Bronson, Kelly .
NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 90-91
[7]   Animal Welfare Management in a Digital World [J].
Buller, Henry ;
Blokhuis, Harry ;
Lokhorst, Kees ;
Silberberg, Mathieu ;
Veissier, Isabelle .
ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (10) :1-12
[8]   The potential impact of synthetic animal protein on livestock production: The new "war against agriculture"? [J].
Burton, Rob J. F. .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2019, 68 :33-45
[9]   Engineering to support wellbeing of dairy animals [J].
Caja, Gerardo ;
Castro-Costa, Andreia ;
Knight, Christopher H. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2016, 83 (02) :136-147