Ideological and Psychological Predictors of COVID-19-Related Collective Action, Opinions, and Health Compliance Across Three Nations

被引:47
作者
Choma, Becky L. [1 ]
Hodson, Gordon [2 ]
Sumantry, David [1 ]
Hanoch, Yaniv [3 ]
Gummerum, Michaela [4 ]
机构
[1] Ryerson Univ, Dept Psychol, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
[2] Brock Univ, Dept Psychol, St Catharines, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton Business Sch, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
political ideology; right-wing authoritarianism; social dominance orientation; empathy; group efficacy; collective action; COVID-19; health compliance behavior; belief in science; perceived risk; RIGHT-WING AUTHORITARIANISM; SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL; DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION; RELATIVE DEPRIVATION; ATTITUDES; IDENTIFICATION; CONSERVATISM; ACCEPTANCE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.5964/jspp.5585
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Until vaccines or treatments are widely available and used, behavioral change (e.g. social distancing) on an unparalleled collective scale is the chief way to curb the spread of COVID-19. Relying on ideology and collective action models as conceptual frameworks, in the present study the role of ideological and psychological factors in COVID-19-related opinions, health compliance behaviors, and collective action were examined in three countries. Results, examining country as a moderator, showed some politically conservative orientations, especially social dominance orientation, relate to less collective action, less support of measures to manage COVID-19, and lower compliance. Variables, including empathy for those affected by COVID-19 and group efficacy also predicted COVID-19-related attitudes and behavior. Belief in science and perceived risk also emerged as key factors to impact compliance-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications for motivating collective compliance are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 143
页数:21
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Angus Reid Institute (ARI), 2020, COVID 19 CAR WHICH C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, RIGHT WING AUTHORITA
[3]   Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? [J].
Batson, CD ;
Polycarpou, MP ;
Harmon-Jones, E ;
Imhoff, HJ ;
Mitchener, EC ;
Bednar, LL ;
Klein, TR ;
Highberger, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (01) :105-118
[4]   The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate [J].
Baumgaertner, Bert ;
Carlisle, Juliet E. ;
Justwan, Florian .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[5]   Ideology and the promotion of social change [J].
Becker, Julia C. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 34 :6-11
[6]   Knowledge, Perceptions, and Motivations Related to HPV Vaccination Among College Women [J].
Bendik, Megan K. ;
Mayo, Rachel M. ;
Parker, Veronica G. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2011, 26 (03) :459-464
[7]   Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action [J].
Bliuc, Ana-Maria ;
McGarty, Craig ;
Reynolds, Katherine ;
Muntele, Daniela .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (01) :19-32
[8]   Parental knowledge of paediatric vaccination [J].
Borras, Eva ;
Dominguez, Angela ;
Fuentes, Miriam ;
Batalla, Joan ;
Cardenosa, Neus ;
Plasencia, Antoni .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9
[9]   Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination [J].
Brewer, Noel T. ;
Chapman, Gretchen B. ;
Gibbons, Frederick X. ;
Gerrard, Meg ;
McCaul, Kevin D. ;
Weinstein, Neil D. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (02) :136-145
[10]   Right-Wing Ideology as a Predictor of Collective Action: A Test Across Four Political Issue Domains [J].
Choma, Becky ;
Hodson, Gordon ;
Jagayat, Arvin ;
Hoffarth, Mark R. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 41 (02) :303-322