A Randomized Comparison of Delivered Energy in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: Biphasic Truncated Exponential Versus Pulsed Biphasic Waveforms

被引:2
|
作者
Trendafilova, Elina [1 ]
Dimitrova, Elena [1 ]
Didon, Jean-Philippe [2 ]
Krasteva, Vessela [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cardiol Hosp, Cardiol Clin, Intens Cardiol Care Unit, 65 Konyovitza Str, Sofia 1309, Bulgaria
[2] Schiller Med SAS, 4 Rue L Pasteur, F-67160 Wissembourg, France
[3] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Biophys & Biomed Engn, Acad G Bonchev Str Bl 105, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
关键词
biphasic waveform defibrillation; atrial fibrillation; cardioversion; delivered energy; efficacy; safety; high-sensitivity troponin; TRANSTHORACIC CARDIOVERSION; EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS; MONOPHASIC SHOCK; CONVERSION; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics11061107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A few randomized trials have compared impedance-compensated biphasic defibrillators in clinical use. We aim to compare pulsed biphasic (PB) and biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveforms in a non-inferiority cardioversion (CVS) study. This was a prospective monocentric randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients admitted for elective CVS of atrial fibrillation (AF) between February 2019 and March 2020 were alternately randomized to treatment with either a PB defibrillator (DEFIGARD TOUCH7, Schiller Medical, Wissembourg, France) or a BTE high-energy (BTE-HE) defibrillator (LIFEPAK15, Physio-Control Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). Fixed-energy protocol (200-200-200 J) was administered. CVS success was accepted if sinus rhythm was restored at 1 min post-shock. The study design considered non-inferiority testing of the primary outcome: cumulative delivered energy (CDE). Seventy-three out of 78 randomized patients received allocated intervention: 38 BTE-HE (52%), 35 PB (48%). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (p > 0.05). Both waveforms had similar CDE (mean +/- standard deviation, 95% confidence interval): BTE-HE (253.9 +/- 120.2 J, 214-293 J) vs. PB (226.0 +/- 109.8 J, 188-264 J), p = 0.31. Indeed, effective PB shocks delivered significantly lower energies by mean of 25.6 J (95% CI 24-27.1 J, p < 0.001). Success rates were similar (BTE-HE vs. PB): 1 min first-shock (84.2% vs. 82.9%), 1 min CVS (97.4% vs. 94.3%), 2 h CVS (94.7% vs. 94.3%), 24 h CVS (92.1% vs. 94.3%), p > 0.05. Safety analysis did not find CVS hazards, reporting insignificant changes of myocardial-specific biomarkers, transient and rare ST-segment deviations, and no case of harmful tachyarrhythmias and apnea. Cardioversion of AF with fixed-energy protocol 200-200-200 J was highly efficient and safe for both PB and BTE-HE waveforms. These similar performances were achieved despite differences in the waveforms' technical design, associated with significantly lower delivered energy for the effective PB shocks. Clinical Trial Registration: Registration number: NCT04032678, trial register: ClinicalTrials.gov.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform energy versus truncated exponential biphasic waveform energy for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Kim, ML
    Kim, SG
    Park, DS
    Gross, JN
    Ferrick, KJ
    Palma, EC
    Fisher, JD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (11): : 1438 - 1440
  • [2] Cardioversion Efficacy Using Pulsed Biphasic or Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveforms: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Schmidt, Anders S.
    Lauridsen, Kasper G.
    Adelborg, Kasper
    Torp, Peter
    Bach, Leif F.
    Jepsen, Simon M.
    Hornung, Nete
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Rickers, Hans
    Lofgren, Bo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (03):
  • [3] A comparison of rectilinear and truncated exponential biphasic waveforms in elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Connelly, Stephanie
    Wharton, Rupert
    Yuen, Ho Ming
    RESUSCITATION, 2013, 84 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [4] A Prospective Randomized Study of the Efficacy of Rectilinear and Truncated Exponential Biphasic Waveforms in the Elective Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Connelly, Stephanie
    Yuen, Brian
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [5] Prospective Randomized comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform shock versus truncated exponential biphasic waveform shock for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Kim, SG
    Kim, M
    Park, D
    Gross, JN
    Ferrick, KJ
    Palma, E
    Fisher, JD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 138A - 138A
  • [6] Prospective, randomized comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Alatawi, F
    Gurevitz, O
    White, RD
    Ammash, NM
    Malouf, JF
    Bruce, CJ
    Moon, BS
    Rosales, AG
    Hodge, D
    Hammill, SC
    Gersh, BJ
    Friedman, PA
    HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [7] Comparison of exponential truncated biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks in transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Kawabata, VS
    Cardoso, LF
    Timerman, S
    Cesar, LA
    Kern, K
    Sanadi, NE
    Ramires, JA
    CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (16) : E79 - E80
  • [8] Comparison of exponential truncated biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks in transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    VS Kawabata
    LF Cardoso
    S Timerman
    LAM Cesar
    JAF Ramires
    Critical Care, 7 (Suppl 2):
  • [9] Comparison of monophasic versus biphasic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
    M Vaisman
    MI Bittencourt
    HCV Rey
    FOD Rangel
    RM Rocha
    RC Costa Filho
    LA Campos
    FLB Gutierrez
    AI Bronchtein
    R Esporcatte
    Critical Care, 9 (Suppl 2):
  • [10] BIPHASIC TRUNCATED EXPONENTIAL WAVEFORM IS SUPERIOR COMPARED TO PULSED BIPHASIC WAVEFORM IN CARDIOVERTING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND ATRIAL FLUTTER: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Schmidt, Anders Sjorslev
    Lauridsen, Kasper
    Adelborg, Kasper
    Bach, Leif F.
    Jepsen, Simon M.
    Hornung, Nete
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Rickers, Hans
    Lofgren, Bo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A354 - A354