Self-Ligating Brackets in Orthodontics A Systematic Review

被引:99
作者
Fleming, Padhraig S. [1 ]
Johal, Ama [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal London Dent Inst, Dept Orthodont, London E1 1BB, England
[2] Queen Marys Inst Dent, Dept Orthodont, London, England
关键词
Self-ligating; Orthodontic; Fixed appliance; Systematic; Meta-analysis; PREADJUSTED EDGEWISE APPLIANCES; CONVENTIONAL TWIN BRACKETS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; INITIAL ALIGNMENT; PAIN; DISCOMFORT; PERCEPTION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.2319/081009-454.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the clinical differences in relation to the use of self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: Electronic databases were searched; no restrictions relating to publication status or language of publication were applied. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) investigating the influence of bracket type on alignment efficiency, subjective pain experience, bond failure rate, arch dimensional changes, rate of orthodontic space closure, periodontal outcomes, and root resorption were selected. Both authors were involved in study selection, validity assessment, and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results: Six RCTs and 11 CCTs were identified. Meta-analysis of the influence of bracket type on subjective pain experience failed to demonstrate a significant advantage for either type of appliance. Statistical analysis of other outcomes was unfeasible because of inadequate methodological design and heterogenous designs. Conclusions: At this stage there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the use of self-ligating fixed orthodontic appliances over conventional appliance systems or vice versa. (Angle Orthod. 2010;80:575-584.)
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 584
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [2] Damon D H, 1998, J Clin Orthod, V32, P670
  • [3] Eberting J J, 2001, Clin Orthod Res, V4, P228
  • [4] Erdinç AME, 2004, EUR J ORTHODONT, V26, P79
  • [5] Pain Experience during Initial Alignment with a Self-Ligating and a Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliance System
    Fleming, P. S.
    DiBiase, A. T.
    Sarri, G.
    Lee, R. T.
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [6] Fleming Padhraig S, 2008, J Clin Orthod, V42, P641
  • [7] Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    DiBiase, Andrew T.
    Sarri, Grammati
    Lee, Robert T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (03) : 340 - 347
  • [8] Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    DiBiase, Andrew T.
    Sarri, Grammati
    Lee, Robert T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (05) : 597 - 602
  • [9] Harradine N W, 2001, Clin Orthod Res, V4, P220, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.40406.x
  • [10] Harradine N W T, 2003, J Orthod, V30, P262, DOI 10.1093/ortho/30.3.262